Eras of financial history and how portfolios went through them
From the 1920s boom to today. For every era — what happened, what worked, what failed, and how each of the 60 models did (only models that existed in our data back then).
Roaring Twenties boom 1926-01 – 1929-08 Regime
The US economy expanded on the back of mass production, electrification, cars and radio. Stock prices rose sharply, helped by margin lending and investment trusts, while consumer prices were roughly stable and the gold standard anchored the currency. The period ended with the market peak in late summer 1929.
Key events
- 1926-1929: broad stock rally with rising margin debt
- 1927-07: Fed eased credit and lowered discount rates to support sterling and gold-standard Europe
- 1928-1929: Fed tightened and urged banks to restrict speculative lending
- 1929-08: NBER-dated business-cycle peak
- 1929-09-03: Dow Jones Industrial Average closing high before the crash
Market facts
- NBER dates the business-cycle peak at August 1929. www.nber.org
- The Dow closed at its pre-crash high on 3 September 1929. en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- US large companies (S&P 500). Strong, momentum-driven gains, especially in 1927-1929.
- US small companies. Participated in the rally; small-cap series for this era are reconstructed and thinly traded.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Positive but modest yields; no inflation drag, so real cash was fine.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Steady income in a low-inflation, gold-standard world; clearly lagged stocks.
What failed
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Lost relative ground to equities (opportunity cost rather than losses).
- Cash (Treasury bills). Lagged equities heavily.
All models in this era (47)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Siegel: all US stocks | +153.7 % | +34.2 % | −5.9 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +153.7 % | +34.2 % | −5.9 % |
| Second-Grader's | +135.8 % | +31.1 % | −5.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +135.8 % | +31.1 % | −5.3 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +135.7 % | +31.1 % | −5.3 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +127.3 % | +29.6 % | −5.0 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +125.7 % | +29.3 % | −8.2 % |
| Merriman two funds | +124.8 % | +29.1 % | −10.3 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +119.0 % | +28.1 % | −5.6 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +118.9 % | +28.1 % | −4.7 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +117.8 % | +27.9 % | −4.7 % |
| Four Corners | +117.3 % | +27.8 % | −9.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +115.6 % | +27.4 % | −4.9 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +110.8 % | +26.5 % | −4.4 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +110.8 % | +26.5 % | −4.4 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +110.8 % | +26.5 % | −4.4 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +100.3 % | +24.5 % | −4.2 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +100.3 % | +24.5 % | −4.1 % |
| Burns Margarita | +97.7 % | +24.0 % | −3.9 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +97.3 % | +23.9 % | −4.0 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +95.1 % | +23.5 % | −3.7 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +95.1 % | +23.5 % | −3.7 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +94.2 % | +23.3 % | −5.6 % |
| Talmud thirds | +93.6 % | +23.2 % | −4.0 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +91.9 % | +22.9 % | −5.0 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +90.0 % | +22.5 % | −3.6 % |
| CalPERS | +88.2 % | +22.1 % | −4.5 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +87.6 % | +22.0 % | −3.4 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +87.6 % | +22.0 % | −3.4 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +87.4 % | +21.9 % | −4.8 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +85.9 % | +21.6 % | −3.6 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +82.2 % | +20.8 % | −4.2 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +79.8 % | +20.4 % | −4.1 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +77.9 % | +19.9 % | −4.4 % |
| Global market portfolio | +75.1 % | +19.4 % | −3.5 % |
| Coffeehouse | +74.9 % | +19.3 % | −4.6 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +73.2 % | +19.0 % | −2.8 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +73.2 % | +19.0 % | −2.8 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +73.2 % | +19.0 % | −2.8 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +67.7 % | +17.7 % | −4.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +59.6 % | +15.9 % | −2.3 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +53.9 % | +14.6 % | −2.1 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +46.8 % | +12.9 % | −1.5 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +41.2 % | +11.5 % | −2.4 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +40.6 % | +11.4 % | −1.2 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +34.2 % | +9.7 % | −1.0 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +18.3 % | +5.5 % | −0.7 % |
Wall Street crash and Great Contraction 1929-09 – 1932-07 Stress window
Stocks collapsed from the September 1929 peak, with the October 1929 crash followed by a long slide to the July 1932 low. Banking panics, deflation and gold-standard constraints deepened the contraction. Unemployment soared and output fell by roughly a quarter or more according to standard estimates.
Key events
- 1929-10-24 and 1929-10-28/29: Black Thursday and the Black Monday/Tuesday sell-offs
- 1930-06: Smoot-Hawley tariff signed
- 1930-11 to 1931: successive US banking panics
- 1931-09: Britain leaves the gold standard
- 1932-07-08: Dow closes at its Depression low
Market facts
- The Dow lost close to 90 percent of its value between Sept 1929 and July 1932 (closing high ~381 to low ~41). en.wikipedia.org
- The Fed's history describes waves of banking panics in 1930-31 that contributed to monetary contraction. www.federalreservehistory.org
- NBER dates the contraction from August 1929 to March 1933. www.nber.org
What worked
- Cash (Treasury bills). Safe nominal asset; with deflation, real cash returns were positive.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). US Treasuries benefited from falling yields and flight to safety, at least until 1931-32.
- Short-term government bonds. Safe and liquid; negligible price risk.
What failed
- US large companies (S&P 500). Largest loss in the dataset (roughly -85 to -90 percent peak to trough depending on the index).
- US small companies. Fell at least as hard as large caps; illiquid.
- Corporate bonds. Spreads widened and defaults rose in 1931-32; lower-grade corporates suffered.
- Gold. Official price unchanged; no market return for US investors.
All models in this era (47)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | −7.1 % | −2.5 % | −10.8 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | −17.2 % | −6.3 % | −21.4 % |
| Graham 25/75 | −23.1 % | −8.6 % | −27.7 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | −27.0 % | −10.2 % | −34.6 % |
| Target Retirement Income | −28.6 % | −10.9 % | −33.6 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | −35.3 % | −13.9 % | −43.5 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | −39.6 % | −15.9 % | −45.4 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | −47.6 % | −19.8 % | −53.5 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | −47.6 % | −19.8 % | −53.5 % |
| Graham 50/50 | −47.6 % | −19.8 % | −53.5 % |
| Global market portfolio | −51.4 % | −21.9 % | −58.3 % |
| Bengen for retirees | −51.8 % | −22.1 % | −58.8 % |
| Coffeehouse | −54.9 % | −23.9 % | −64.6 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | −55.2 % | −24.1 % | −63.5 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | −55.4 % | −24.2 % | −61.5 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | −55.4 % | −24.2 % | −61.5 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | −55.4 % | −24.2 % | −61.7 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | −55.5 % | −24.3 % | −64.3 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | −56.7 % | −25.0 % | −64.6 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | −56.9 % | −25.0 % | −63.1 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | −59.0 % | −26.3 % | −65.1 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | −59.0 % | −26.3 % | −65.1 % |
| CalPERS | −60.1 % | −27.0 % | −68.1 % |
| Burns Margarita | −60.1 % | −27.0 % | −66.3 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | −60.6 % | −27.3 % | −68.0 % |
| Talmud thirds | −60.7 % | −27.4 % | −69.9 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | −61.5 % | −27.9 % | −69.5 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | −62.2 % | −28.3 % | −70.2 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | −62.3 % | −28.4 % | −68.6 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | −62.5 % | −28.5 % | −71.0 % |
| Collins 75/25 | −65.4 % | −30.5 % | −71.6 % |
| Graham 75/25 | −65.4 % | −30.5 % | −71.6 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | −65.4 % | −30.5 % | −71.6 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | −66.1 % | −31.0 % | −72.8 % |
| Ferri Core Four | −68.3 % | −32.5 % | −74.9 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | −68.3 % | −32.6 % | −74.4 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | −68.4 % | −32.6 % | −74.6 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | −71.0 % | −34.6 % | −77.0 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | −71.2 % | −34.8 % | −77.4 % |
| Second-Grader's | −73.6 % | −36.6 % | −79.4 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | −73.6 % | −36.6 % | −79.4 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | −73.7 % | −36.7 % | −79.5 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | −78.2 % | −40.6 % | −83.7 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | −78.2 % | −40.6 % | −83.7 % |
| Merriman two funds | −78.3 % | −40.7 % | −85.6 % |
| Ramsey four funds | −78.9 % | −41.3 % | −84.7 % |
| Four Corners | −79.0 % | −41.5 % | −86.7 % |
New Deal recovery 1932-08 – 1937-02 Regime
After the 1932 low, stocks rebounded violently in 1933 as the banking system was closed and reorganised, the dollar was taken off gold and later devalued. Output grew rapidly from a very low base, though unemployment stayed very high. Prices stopped falling and small caps and cyclicals led the recovery.
Key events
- 1933-03: Roosevelt declares the bank holiday; NBER trough in March 1933
- 1933-04: US leaves the gold standard domestically; private gold holding restricted
- 1933-1934: Glass-Steagall, FDIC, Securities Acts passed
- 1934-01: Gold Reserve Act, gold revalued from $20.67 to $35/oz
- 1936-1937: Fed doubles reserve requirements, tightening begins
Market facts
- NBER dates the trough of the Great Depression contraction at March 1933 and the next peak at May 1937. www.nber.org
- The Gold Reserve Act of 1934 raised the official gold price to $35 per ounce. www.federalreservehistory.org
What worked
- US small companies. Small caps are widely documented to have rebounded more strongly than large caps from the 1932 trough.
- US large companies (S&P 500). Sharp rebound from the 1932 lows, though still below 1929 levels by 1937.
- Gold. Official revaluation to $35 (about +69 percent in dollar terms) is a policy step change, not a market return.
What failed
- Cash (Treasury bills). Near-zero yields; lagged risk assets, but no inflation drag.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Low yields limited gains; a modest income asset.
All models in this era (47)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Four Corners | +471.4 % | +46.3 % | −46.5 % |
| Merriman two funds | +448.0 % | +44.9 % | −46.8 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +402.7 % | +42.2 % | −36.2 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +268.7 % | +32.9 % | −28.9 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +268.7 % | +32.9 % | −28.9 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +254.0 % | +31.8 % | −27.3 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +245.8 % | +31.1 % | −28.1 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +234.2 % | +30.1 % | −26.1 % |
| Second-Grader's | +234.2 % | +30.1 % | −26.1 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +228.8 % | +29.7 % | −26.3 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +224.9 % | +29.3 % | −27.9 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +218.0 % | +28.7 % | −24.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +216.5 % | +28.6 % | −24.3 % |
| Coffeehouse | +213.2 % | +28.3 % | −29.8 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +212.9 % | +28.3 % | −31.6 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +208.5 % | +27.9 % | −25.5 % |
| CalPERS | +207.2 % | +27.7 % | −26.1 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +202.3 % | +27.3 % | −23.1 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +187.8 % | +25.9 % | −25.9 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +187.3 % | +25.9 % | −21.6 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +187.3 % | +25.9 % | −21.6 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +187.3 % | +25.9 % | −21.6 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +185.4 % | +25.7 % | −21.2 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +183.4 % | +25.5 % | −21.1 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +179.7 % | +25.2 % | −25.7 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +176.6 % | +24.9 % | −28.9 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +173.1 % | +24.5 % | −23.3 % |
| Talmud thirds | +172.6 % | +24.5 % | −29.4 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +172.6 % | +24.5 % | −25.6 % |
| Burns Margarita | +163.6 % | +23.5 % | −19.1 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +159.0 % | +23.1 % | −18.6 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +159.0 % | +23.1 % | −18.6 % |
| Global market portfolio | +154.1 % | +22.6 % | −18.8 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +153.4 % | +22.5 % | −17.9 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +153.0 % | +22.5 % | −17.8 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +145.7 % | +21.7 % | −17.0 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +145.7 % | +21.7 % | −17.0 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +120.7 % | +18.8 % | −13.9 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +120.7 % | +18.8 % | −13.9 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +120.7 % | +18.8 % | −13.9 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +107.8 % | +17.3 % | −17.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +105.1 % | +17.0 % | −11.7 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +103.1 % | +16.7 % | −15.5 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +76.4 % | +13.2 % | −7.3 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +66.4 % | +11.8 % | −5.9 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +58.7 % | +10.6 % | −5.0 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +31.8 % | +6.2 % | −6.4 % |
Recession within the Depression 1937-03 – 1938-03 Stress window
A premature tightening of fiscal and monetary policy (higher reserve requirements, gold sterilisation, new payroll taxes, spending cuts) coincided with a sharp relapse. Industrial production and employment fell steeply and stocks lost roughly half their value in about a year. Policy then eased again and the recovery resumed.
Key events
- 1936-1937: Fed raises bank reserve requirements in three steps
- 1937-03: US equity market peak
- 1937-05: NBER business-cycle peak
- 1938-03: US equity market trough
- 1938-06: NBER trough
Market facts
- NBER dates this recession from May 1937 to June 1938. www.nber.org
- The Fed's own history describes the 1937-38 downturn and its link to the reserve-requirement increases. www.federalreservehistory.org
- The Dow fell about 49 percent between its 10 March 1937 close (194.4) and its 31 March 1938 close (98.95), over 268 trading days. www.fool.com
What worked
- Cash (Treasury bills). Safe; deflation made it fine in real terms.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Treasuries held value better than stocks as yields eased.
- Short-term government bonds. Stable.
What failed
- US large companies (S&P 500). Roughly halved in about a year (the Dow fell about 49 percent, from 194.4 on 10 March 1937 to 98.95 on 31 March 1938, closing basis).
- US small companies. Fell sharply, at least as much as large caps.
All models in this era (47)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | −7.9 % | −7.3 % | −7.9 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | −8.4 % | −7.7 % | −8.6 % |
| Graham 25/75 | −11.1 % | −10.3 % | −11.2 % |
| Target Retirement Income | −14.0 % | −13.0 % | −14.1 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | −18.1 % | −16.9 % | −18.7 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | −20.7 % | −19.3 % | −20.8 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | −21.3 % | −19.9 % | −22.3 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | −25.1 % | −23.4 % | −25.1 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | −25.1 % | −23.4 % | −25.1 % |
| Graham 50/50 | −25.1 % | −23.4 % | −25.1 % |
| Global market portfolio | −29.9 % | −28.0 % | −30.1 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | −30.3 % | −28.3 % | −30.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | −30.3 % | −28.3 % | −30.3 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | −30.9 % | −28.9 % | −30.9 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | −31.5 % | −29.5 % | −31.5 % |
| Bengen for retirees | −32.3 % | −30.2 % | −32.3 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | −32.9 % | −30.8 % | −32.9 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | −32.9 % | −30.8 % | −32.9 % |
| Burns Margarita | −33.7 % | −31.6 % | −33.7 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | −35.4 % | −33.2 % | −36.1 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | −36.1 % | −33.9 % | −36.1 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | −36.3 % | −34.0 % | −36.8 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | −36.4 % | −34.2 % | −36.9 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | −37.6 % | −35.3 % | −38.4 % |
| Collins 75/25 | −37.8 % | −35.5 % | −37.8 % |
| Graham 75/25 | −37.8 % | −35.5 % | −37.8 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | −37.8 % | −35.5 % | −37.8 % |
| Coffeehouse | −38.0 % | −35.7 % | −39.1 % |
| CalPERS | −38.4 % | −36.1 % | −39.0 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | −38.7 % | −36.4 % | −39.5 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | −40.3 % | −37.8 % | −40.3 % |
| Talmud thirds | −40.5 % | −38.0 % | −41.7 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | −40.5 % | −38.1 % | −41.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | −41.2 % | −38.7 % | −41.2 % |
| Ferri Core Four | −41.5 % | −39.1 % | −41.8 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | −42.4 % | −39.9 % | −43.2 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | −42.6 % | −40.1 % | −42.6 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | −43.2 % | −40.7 % | −43.2 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | −44.8 % | −42.2 % | −44.8 % |
| Second-Grader's | −44.9 % | −42.4 % | −44.9 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | −44.9 % | −42.4 % | −44.9 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | −45.3 % | −42.7 % | −45.3 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | −49.5 % | −46.7 % | −49.5 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | −49.5 % | −46.7 % | −49.5 % |
| Ramsey four funds | −55.5 % | −52.7 % | −55.5 % |
| Merriman two funds | −59.0 % | −56.1 % | −59.7 % |
| Four Corners | −61.3 % | −58.4 % | −62.2 % |
Rearmament and World War II 1938-04 – 1945-09 Regime
The economy recovered on rearmament and then full wartime mobilisation. Stocks bottomed in 1942 and rose through the war. The Fed pegged interest rates (short-term bills near 3/8 percent and a cap on long Treasury yields), and wage and price controls suppressed measured inflation, so bonds and cash earned very low but steady returns.
Key events
- 1939-09: Germany invades Poland; war begins in Europe
- 1941-12: Pearl Harbor; US enters the war
- 1942: price controls and the Fed's interest-rate peg
- 1942-04: US stocks reach a wartime low
- 1945-02 to 1945-10: brief NBER contraction around the war's end
Market facts
- NBER dates a brief recession from February to October 1945. www.nber.org
- The Fed pegged Treasury yields during the war until the 1951 Treasury-Fed Accord. www.federalreservehistory.org
What worked
- US large companies (S&P 500). Positive returns from the 1942 low through 1945 despite war risk.
- US small companies. Strong gains from depressed levels, per general literature.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Stable, low-volatility returns because yields were capped by policy.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Nominal near-zero yields; small real loss only once postwar inflation arrived.
What failed
- Cash (Treasury bills). Close to zero nominal return.
- Corporate bonds. Safe, but low income.
All models in this era (47)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Four Corners | +427.0 % | +24.8 % | −32.3 % |
| Merriman two funds | +399.9 % | +23.9 % | −32.0 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +304.8 % | +20.5 % | −26.3 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +205.8 % | +16.1 % | −28.1 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +205.8 % | +16.1 % | −28.1 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +195.2 % | +15.5 % | −23.2 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +187.7 % | +15.1 % | −20.5 % |
| Coffeehouse | +187.5 % | +15.1 % | −18.3 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +184.2 % | +14.9 % | −18.2 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +183.6 % | +14.9 % | −20.6 % |
| Second-Grader's | +180.7 % | +14.8 % | −25.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +180.7 % | +14.8 % | −25.3 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +176.2 % | +14.5 % | −25.5 % |
| CalPERS | +171.0 % | +14.2 % | −17.1 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +168.8 % | +14.1 % | −24.0 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +167.9 % | +14.0 % | −21.8 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +167.8 % | +14.0 % | −22.3 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +160.6 % | +13.6 % | −17.9 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +157.4 % | +13.4 % | −22.6 % |
| Talmud thirds | +155.9 % | +13.3 % | −19.5 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +152.5 % | +13.1 % | −18.2 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +151.8 % | +13.1 % | −16.3 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +146.3 % | +12.8 % | −21.2 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +146.3 % | +12.8 % | −21.2 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +146.3 % | +12.8 % | −21.2 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +144.2 % | +12.6 % | −14.2 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +143.5 % | +12.6 % | −17.9 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +143.4 % | +12.6 % | −19.6 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +143.4 % | +12.6 % | −16.6 % |
| Burns Margarita | +128.8 % | +11.7 % | −18.9 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +125.4 % | +11.4 % | −18.4 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +125.4 % | +11.4 % | −18.4 % |
| Global market portfolio | +123.8 % | +11.3 % | −14.2 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +121.2 % | +11.2 % | −17.5 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +120.9 % | +11.1 % | −16.8 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +115.5 % | +10.8 % | −17.0 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +115.5 % | +10.8 % | −17.0 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +96.8 % | +9.4 % | −14.0 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +96.8 % | +9.4 % | −14.0 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +96.8 % | +9.4 % | −14.0 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +94.8 % | +9.3 % | −8.4 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +90.7 % | +9.0 % | −9.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +85.0 % | +8.5 % | −11.2 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +63.4 % | +6.8 % | −8.0 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +55.8 % | +6.1 % | −6.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +49.8 % | +5.5 % | −5.4 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +25.0 % | +3.0 % | −3.4 % |
Postwar expansion 1945-10 – 1965-12 Regime
The US emerged as the dominant economy under Bretton Woods. After a brief postwar inflation spike in 1946-47, prices were stable for most of the period, interest rates drifted up from very low levels, and stocks delivered strong returns across several expansions. The 1951 Accord freed the Fed from pegging bond yields.
Key events
- 1946: price controls end and inflation spikes
- 1948-11 to 1949-10: NBER recession
- 1951-03: Treasury-Fed Accord
- 1953-07 to 1954-05 and 1957-08 to 1958-04 and 1960-04 to 1961-02: NBER recessions
- 1944-07: Bretton Woods conference established the gold-dollar system
Market facts
- NBER lists recessions in 1948-49, 1953-54, 1957-58 and 1960-61, all short. www.nber.org
- The Treasury-Fed Accord of March 1951 ended the Fed's commitment to pegging government bond yields. www.federalreservehistory.org
What worked
- US large companies (S&P 500). Strong long-run equity returns, particularly 1949 onward.
- US small companies. Generally strong; small-cap series are broad indices of lower reliability early on.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Low but positive real returns for much of the period.
What failed
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Rising yields over 1946-1965 produced poor real returns for long bonds, with losses in some stretches.
- Gold. Fixed at $35 under Bretton Woods, so effectively no return.
All models in this era (47)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Four Corners | +1697.2 % | +15.3 % | −29.9 % |
| Merriman two funds | +1652.2 % | +15.2 % | −29.0 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +1256.8 % | +13.7 % | −28.7 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +1212.9 % | +13.6 % | −24.3 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +1212.9 % | +13.6 % | −24.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +994.7 % | +12.5 % | −22.0 % |
| Second-Grader's | +994.7 % | +12.5 % | −22.0 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +985.2 % | +12.5 % | −22.1 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +912.6 % | +12.1 % | −22.4 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +897.4 % | +12.0 % | −20.9 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +860.4 % | +11.8 % | −19.9 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +813.5 % | +11.5 % | −20.4 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +807.2 % | +11.5 % | −19.7 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +783.9 % | +11.4 % | −19.8 % |
| Talmud thirds | +768.9 % | +11.3 % | −17.5 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +763.8 % | +11.2 % | −17.7 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +733.5 % | +11.0 % | −22.0 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +723.9 % | +11.0 % | −18.6 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +723.9 % | +11.0 % | −18.6 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +723.9 % | +11.0 % | −18.6 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +717.6 % | +10.9 % | −19.7 % |
| CalPERS | +689.5 % | +10.7 % | −18.4 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +676.8 % | +10.7 % | −17.0 % |
| Coffeehouse | +670.3 % | +10.6 % | −17.7 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +651.6 % | +10.5 % | −17.9 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +614.3 % | +10.2 % | −17.4 % |
| Burns Margarita | +599.1 % | +10.1 % | −16.6 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +597.6 % | +10.1 % | −16.7 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +595.1 % | +10.0 % | −17.2 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +576.1 % | +9.9 % | −16.2 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +576.1 % | +9.9 % | −16.2 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +537.4 % | +9.6 % | −15.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +514.1 % | +9.4 % | −15.4 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +510.9 % | +9.3 % | −14.9 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +510.9 % | +9.3 % | −14.9 % |
| Global market portfolio | +474.1 % | +9.0 % | −14.8 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +469.8 % | +9.0 % | −16.8 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +396.1 % | +8.2 % | −12.4 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +396.1 % | +8.2 % | −12.4 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +396.1 % | +8.2 % | −12.4 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +330.9 % | +7.5 % | −9.4 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +311.0 % | +7.2 % | −10.5 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +260.2 % | +6.5 % | −9.0 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +219.9 % | +5.9 % | −7.2 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +185.3 % | +5.3 % | −5.8 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +154.5 % | +4.7 % | −4.6 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +95.0 % | +3.4 % | −4.1 % |
Golden age of the 1950s 1950-01 – 1959-12 Regime
A decade of strong US growth, low inflation (apart from a Korean War bump in 1950-51), rising household wealth and a long stock bull market that began in 1949. Interest rates rose gradually after the Accord. It is the classic example of a calm regime in which plain equities beat everything else.
Key events
- 1950-06: Korean War begins
- 1951-03: Treasury-Fed Accord
- 1954-11: Dow regains its 1929 high (reached 25 years after the crash)
- 1956: Interstate Highway Act
- 1957-08 to 1958-04: NBER recession
Market facts
- The Dow Jones Industrial Average only regained its 1929 closing high in November 1954. en.wikipedia.org
- NBER dates recessions in 1953-54 and 1957-58. www.nber.org
- The Dow's 1929 closing high was 381.17 (3 Sept 1929); it was regained with a close of 382.74 on 23 Nov 1954. en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- US large companies (S&P 500). Among the best decades for US equities on record.
- US small companies. Strong, in line with the bull market.
What failed
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Yields rose through the decade; long bonds were a weak, sometimes negative performer.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Low real return.
All models in this era (47)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Four Corners | +522.2 % | +20.1 % | −19.9 % |
| Merriman two funds | +488.6 % | +19.4 % | −18.2 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +449.3 % | +18.6 % | −16.6 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +438.8 % | +18.3 % | −14.9 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +438.8 % | +18.3 % | −14.9 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +372.9 % | +16.8 % | −13.4 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +370.2 % | +16.7 % | −12.8 % |
| Second-Grader's | +370.2 % | +16.7 % | −12.8 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +342.1 % | +16.0 % | −12.2 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +338.5 % | +15.9 % | −11.9 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +323.3 % | +15.5 % | −11.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +310.1 % | +15.2 % | −11.4 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +308.5 % | +15.1 % | −11.2 % |
| Talmud thirds | +300.1 % | +14.9 % | −12.5 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +298.7 % | +14.8 % | −12.6 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +293.0 % | +14.7 % | −12.1 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +287.1 % | +14.5 % | −10.9 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +280.2 % | +14.3 % | −10.6 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +280.2 % | +14.3 % | −10.6 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +280.2 % | +14.3 % | −10.6 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +274.5 % | +14.1 % | −10.9 % |
| CalPERS | +262.4 % | +13.7 % | −10.7 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +262.2 % | +13.7 % | −10.2 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +254.6 % | +13.5 % | −10.1 % |
| Coffeehouse | +244.9 % | +13.2 % | −10.4 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +244.5 % | +13.2 % | −10.8 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +239.4 % | +13.0 % | −9.8 % |
| Burns Margarita | +236.4 % | +12.9 % | −9.6 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +231.3 % | +12.7 % | −9.4 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +228.2 % | +12.6 % | −9.4 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +228.2 % | +12.6 % | −9.4 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +214.0 % | +12.1 % | −9.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +205.2 % | +11.8 % | −8.9 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +204.3 % | +11.8 % | −8.8 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +204.3 % | +11.8 % | −8.8 % |
| Global market portfolio | +188.9 % | +11.2 % | −8.6 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +188.6 % | +11.2 % | −8.8 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +160.8 % | +10.1 % | −7.6 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +160.8 % | +10.1 % | −7.6 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +160.8 % | +10.1 % | −7.6 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +132.1 % | +8.8 % | −7.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +126.6 % | +8.5 % | −6.6 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +97.1 % | +7.0 % | −5.6 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +88.5 % | +6.5 % | −5.5 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +73.2 % | +5.6 % | −5.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +59.1 % | +4.8 % | −4.6 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +45.0 % | +3.8 % | −1.0 % |
Go-go years and nifty-fifty 1966-01 – 1968-12 Regime
Vietnam spending and the Great Society stimulated an overheated economy, and inflation began to creep up from the low 1960s levels. The stock market became speculative (the 'go-go' years, growth stocks and conglomerates), with a sharp but brief bear market in 1966 and a final peak in late 1968. The Bretton Woods gold system came under growing strain.
Key events
- 1966-01-18: Dow trades above 1000 intraday for the first time but closes below it (best close 995.15 on 1966-02-09)
- 1966-02 to 1966-10: 1966 bear market and credit crunch
- 1967-1968: speculative highs, conglomerates and new-issues boom
- 1968-03: London gold pool collapses; two-tier gold market
- 1968-11/12: peak of the late-1960s bull market
Market facts
- NBER dates the next recession as starting December 1969. www.nber.org
- The Fed's history describes the rise of inflation in the late 1960s under Great Society and Vietnam spending. www.federalreservehistory.org
- The Dow touched 1,000 intraday on 18 Jan 1966 but its highest 1966 close was 995.15; the first close above 1,000 came on 14 Nov 1972. en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- US large companies (S&P 500). Growth and speculative stocks did well until the 1968 peak.
- US small companies. Speculative small caps and new issues boomed in 1967-68.
What failed
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Rising inflation and yields hurt long bonds.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Real return squeezed as inflation rose.
All models in this era (47)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Four Corners | +83.0 % | +22.3 % | −18.6 % |
| Merriman two funds | +77.4 % | +21.1 % | −18.5 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +67.0 % | +18.6 % | −17.7 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +51.2 % | +14.8 % | −12.9 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +44.6 % | +13.1 % | −11.4 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +43.6 % | +12.8 % | −11.9 % |
| Coffeehouse | +42.9 % | +12.6 % | −11.3 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +41.8 % | +12.4 % | −9.8 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +40.5 % | +12.0 % | −10.6 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +40.0 % | +11.9 % | −13.6 % |
| CalPERS | +37.5 % | +11.2 % | −11.5 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +37.1 % | +11.1 % | −9.9 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +35.9 % | +10.8 % | −10.4 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +34.0 % | +10.2 % | −15.5 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +34.0 % | +10.2 % | −15.5 % |
| Talmud thirds | +33.9 % | +10.2 % | −10.3 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +32.6 % | +9.9 % | −12.4 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +32.2 % | +9.8 % | −13.7 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +31.2 % | +9.5 % | −13.9 % |
| Second-Grader's | +31.2 % | +9.5 % | −13.9 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +29.9 % | +9.1 % | −13.1 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +29.8 % | +9.1 % | −12.7 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +28.9 % | +8.8 % | −11.8 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +28.9 % | +8.8 % | −11.2 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +28.5 % | +8.7 % | −12.4 % |
| Global market portfolio | +28.3 % | +8.7 % | −9.7 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +27.5 % | +8.4 % | −11.0 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +27.0 % | +8.3 % | −11.8 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +27.0 % | +8.3 % | −11.8 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +27.0 % | +8.3 % | −11.8 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +25.6 % | +7.9 % | −7.4 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +25.5 % | +7.9 % | −0.9 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +25.2 % | +7.8 % | −10.0 % |
| Burns Margarita | +24.6 % | +7.6 % | −10.8 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +24.1 % | +7.5 % | −10.6 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +24.1 % | +7.5 % | −10.6 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +24.1 % | +7.5 % | −10.2 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +22.7 % | +7.1 % | −9.9 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +22.7 % | +7.1 % | −9.9 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +19.7 % | +6.2 % | −8.7 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +19.7 % | +6.2 % | −8.7 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +19.7 % | +6.2 % | −8.7 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +19.0 % | +6.0 % | −7.7 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +18.5 % | +5.8 % | −7.6 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +13.6 % | +4.3 % | −6.2 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +12.0 % | +3.9 % | −5.7 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +11.2 % | +3.6 % | −5.1 % |
The Great Inflation (stagflation) 1969-01 – 1982-07 Regime
Over 14 years the US moved from the end of the Bretton Woods system to repeated recessions with persistent high inflation, culminating in the Volcker disinflation. Stocks went sideways in nominal terms and lost heavily in real terms, nominal interest rates rose to historic peaks and real assets - gold and commodities - were the standout winners. The era includes the end of dollar-gold convertibility in 1971, two oil shocks and the first modern high-inflation episodes.
Key events
- 1971-08-15: Nixon suspends dollar convertibility into gold
- 1973-10: OPEC oil embargo
- 1974-08: Nixon resigns; inflation reaches double digits
- 1979-08: Paul Volcker becomes Fed Chair
- 1982-08: Dow begins a long bull market
Market facts
- The Fed's essay describes the Great Inflation of roughly 1965-1982 and its causes. www.federalreservehistory.org
- NBER dates recessions: 1969-12 to 1970-11, 1973-11 to 1975-03, 1980-01 to 1980-07, 1981-07 to 1982-11. www.nber.org
What worked
- Gold. Market price rose from the $35 official peg to a January 1980 peak of about $850 (see gold-era source).
- Commodities. Oil, food and metals surged, fitting the regime.
- Real estate (REITs). Mixed: the 1973-74 collapse then recovery; limited reliable data.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Roughly break-even in real terms as short rates rose with inflation.
What failed
- US large companies (S&P 500). Flat to negative in real terms; deep drawdowns in 1973-74 and 1981-82.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Persistent real losses as inflation and yields rose.
- Intermediate government bonds (10 y). Real losses.
- Corporate bonds. Real losses as spreads and yields rose.
All models in this era (50)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Butterfly | +288.4 % | +10.5 % | −17.5 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | +251.1 % | +9.7 % | −11.7 % |
| Four Corners | +203.7 % | +8.5 % | −40.9 % |
| Merriman two funds | +193.0 % | +8.2 % | −42.0 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +181.9 % | +7.9 % | −22.5 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +180.7 % | +7.9 % | −2.0 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +172.4 % | +7.7 % | −27.8 % |
| Talmud thirds | +163.7 % | +7.4 % | −23.7 % |
| Coffeehouse | +159.6 % | +7.3 % | −25.0 % |
| Gone Fishin' | +157.1 % | +7.2 % | −26.0 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +153.9 % | +7.1 % | −25.3 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +144.2 % | +6.8 % | −25.6 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +140.6 % | +6.7 % | −35.3 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +138.8 % | +6.6 % | −31.1 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +133.3 % | +6.4 % | −13.0 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +129.2 % | +6.3 % | −27.2 % |
| CalPERS | +128.3 % | +6.3 % | −30.4 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +123.8 % | +6.1 % | −14.6 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +120.3 % | +6.0 % | −30.4 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +117.9 % | +5.9 % | −47.8 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +116.1 % | +5.8 % | −30.0 % |
| Global market portfolio | +114.1 % | +5.8 % | −26.2 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +105.0 % | +5.4 % | −20.0 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +103.9 % | +5.4 % | −40.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +103.5 % | +5.4 % | −29.1 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +103.3 % | +5.4 % | −36.8 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +101.9 % | +5.3 % | −33.7 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +101.7 % | +5.3 % | −24.2 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +101.7 % | +5.3 % | −24.2 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +101.7 % | +5.3 % | −24.2 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +101.6 % | +5.3 % | −14.3 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +101.2 % | +5.3 % | −11.7 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +100.9 % | +5.3 % | −12.1 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +100.9 % | +5.3 % | −30.0 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +100.3 % | +5.2 % | −29.0 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +100.3 % | +5.2 % | −29.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +99.3 % | +5.2 % | −38.2 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +99.2 % | +5.2 % | −31.3 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +99.2 % | +5.2 % | −31.3 % |
| Burns Margarita | +98.7 % | +5.2 % | −32.1 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +96.3 % | +5.1 % | −41.7 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +96.2 % | +5.1 % | −35.8 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +96.2 % | +5.1 % | −35.8 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +96.2 % | +5.1 % | −35.8 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +94.3 % | +5.0 % | −38.0 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +92.2 % | +4.9 % | −40.2 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +89.9 % | +4.8 % | −42.3 % |
| Second-Grader's | +89.9 % | +4.8 % | −42.3 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +84.6 % | +4.6 % | −46.5 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +84.6 % | +4.6 % | −46.5 % |
1973-74 oil shock and bear market 1973-01 – 1974-12 Stress window
The first oil shock quadrupled crude prices, the Bretton Woods system had just collapsed, and the US entered its longest recession since the 1930s. Stocks fell nearly half in less than two years, inflation reached double digits and unemployment rose; interest rates also rose, so both stocks and bonds disappointed.
Key events
- 1973-01: stock market peak
- 1973-10-06: Yom Kippur War starts; OAPEC oil embargo
- 1973-11: NBER peak
- 1974-08: Nixon resigns
- 1974-10: S&P 500 closing low
Market facts
- The S&P 500 fell about 48 percent from its January 1973 high to its October 1974 low. en.wikipedia.org
- The Fed's history covers the 1973-74 oil shock and subsequent inflation. www.federalreservehistory.org
- NBER dates the recession from November 1973 to March 1975. www.nber.org
What worked
- Commodities. Oil and many commodities spiked.
- Gold. Rose strongly after the 1971 end of convertibility and as inflation climbed; legal US ownership from 1975.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Short rates rose; roughly offset inflation.
What failed
- US large companies (S&P 500). Roughly -48 percent peak to trough.
- US small companies. Fell harder than large caps; small-cap trough was in late 1974.
- Real estate (REITs). Mortgage REITs and real estate lenders collapsed in 1974.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Real losses as inflation rose, though nominal yields were volatile.
All models in this era (50)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permanent Portfolio | +27.1 % | +12.7 % | −9.8 % |
| Golden Butterfly | +10.9 % | +5.3 % | −13.3 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +7.5 % | +3.7 % | −1.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | −3.6 % | −1.8 % | −10.0 % |
| Graham 25/75 | −6.2 % | −3.1 % | −12.1 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | −8.7 % | −4.4 % | −12.6 % |
| Target Retirement Income | −8.8 % | −4.5 % | −14.3 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | −9.3 % | −4.7 % | −14.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | −14.7 % | −7.7 % | −20.0 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | −18.9 % | −10.0 % | −24.2 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | −18.9 % | −10.0 % | −24.2 % |
| Graham 50/50 | −18.9 % | −10.0 % | −24.2 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | −20.1 % | −10.6 % | −22.5 % |
| Gone Fishin' | −21.2 % | −11.3 % | −26.0 % |
| Global market portfolio | −21.9 % | −11.6 % | −26.2 % |
| Talmud thirds | −22.0 % | −11.7 % | −23.6 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | −22.1 % | −11.7 % | −25.3 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | −22.3 % | −11.8 % | −25.5 % |
| Coffeehouse | −22.3 % | −11.8 % | −24.6 % |
| Bengen for retirees | −23.7 % | −12.7 % | −27.1 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | −23.8 % | −12.7 % | −29.0 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | −23.8 % | −12.7 % | −29.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | −24.1 % | −12.9 % | −29.1 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | −24.8 % | −13.3 % | −30.0 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | −25.4 % | −13.6 % | −27.7 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | −25.9 % | −13.9 % | −30.0 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | −26.1 % | −14.1 % | −31.3 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | −26.1 % | −14.1 % | −31.3 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | −26.7 % | −14.4 % | −30.4 % |
| Burns Margarita | −26.9 % | −14.5 % | −32.1 % |
| CalPERS | −27.1 % | −14.6 % | −30.3 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | −28.3 % | −15.3 % | −31.0 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | −28.9 % | −15.7 % | −33.7 % |
| Collins 75/25 | −30.8 % | −16.8 % | −35.8 % |
| Graham 75/25 | −30.8 % | −16.8 % | −35.8 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | −30.8 % | −16.8 % | −35.8 % |
| Ferri Core Four | −32.4 % | −17.8 % | −36.8 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | −32.4 % | −17.8 % | −35.3 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | −33.0 % | −18.2 % | −38.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | −33.6 % | −18.5 % | −38.2 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | −35.3 % | −19.5 % | −40.2 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | −36.6 % | −20.4 % | −40.6 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | −37.0 % | −20.6 % | −41.7 % |
| Second-Grader's | −37.5 % | −20.9 % | −42.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | −37.5 % | −20.9 % | −42.3 % |
| Four Corners | −40.4 % | −22.8 % | −40.4 % |
| Merriman two funds | −41.3 % | −23.4 % | −41.7 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | −41.7 % | −23.7 % | −46.5 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | −41.7 % | −23.7 % | −46.5 % |
| Ramsey four funds | −45.5 % | −26.2 % | −47.8 % |
Second oil shock and the Volcker disinflation 1979-01 – 1982-08 Stress window
The Iranian revolution produced a second oil shock, and CPI inflation approached 15 percent in 1980. Paul Volcker's Fed switched in October 1979 to targeting money growth and drove short rates to around 20 percent in 1981, causing two recessions in three years. Inflation fell sharply, long-term bond yields peaked in 1981, and stocks bottomed in August 1982.
Key events
- 1979-10-06: Fed announces the new operating procedures (the 'Saturday Night Special')
- 1980-01: NBER peak; gold reaches roughly $850 on January 21
- 1980-03: credit controls imposed and later removed
- 1981-07 to 1982-11: second recession of the double-dip
- 1982-08: market trough; unemployment peaks at 10.8 percent in late 1982
Market facts
- The Fed's essay describes the Volcker disinflation of 1979-1982, with the fed funds rate reaching about 20 percent in 1981. www.federalreservehistory.org
- NBER: recessions Jan-Jul 1980 and Jul 1981-Nov 1982. www.nber.org
- The Fed also has an essay on the 1979 oil shock. www.federalreservehistory.org
- Gold peaked at about $850 per ounce at the London fix on 21 Jan 1980 and then fell sharply within days; annual average prices were about $615 in 1980, $460 in 1981 and $376 in 1982. metalcharts.org
What worked
- Cash (Treasury bills). T-bills yielding double digits gave large real returns.
- Short-term government bonds. High yields; relatively limited price damage.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Brutal losses until the September 1981 yield peak, then the start of an exceptional rally.
- Gold. Soared in 1979 to the January 1980 peak.
What failed
- Gold. Fell by more than half from the January 1980 peak: the 1982 annual average (about $376) was already some 56 percent below $850.
- Commodities. Fell with the dollar's rise and recession in 1981-82.
- US large companies (S&P 500). Choppy; down in 1981, lower in 1982 until the August low.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Large losses in 1979-1981 as 10-year yields passed 15 percent.
All models in this era (50)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Four Corners | +89.1 % | +19.0 % | −16.0 % |
| Merriman two funds | +86.4 % | +18.5 % | −15.9 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +74.6 % | +16.4 % | −15.8 % |
| Golden Butterfly | +69.7 % | +15.5 % | −12.7 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +68.9 % | +15.4 % | −10.6 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +68.7 % | +15.3 % | −11.7 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +67.5 % | +15.1 % | −9.7 % |
| Talmud thirds | +64.1 % | +14.5 % | −7.7 % |
| Gone Fishin' | +62.3 % | +14.1 % | −11.6 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +61.9 % | +14.0 % | −9.9 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +60.9 % | +13.8 % | −11.3 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +59.5 % | +13.6 % | −12.2 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | +59.3 % | +13.5 % | −11.7 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +59.2 % | +13.5 % | −16.3 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +59.2 % | +13.5 % | −16.3 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +59.0 % | +13.5 % | −12.6 % |
| Coffeehouse | +58.7 % | +13.4 % | −11.5 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +57.3 % | +13.1 % | −0.7 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +57.2 % | +13.1 % | −10.4 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +56.3 % | +12.9 % | −13.2 % |
| Second-Grader's | +56.3 % | +12.9 % | −13.2 % |
| CalPERS | +56.2 % | +12.9 % | −11.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +55.2 % | +12.7 % | −11.6 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +54.8 % | +12.7 % | −10.9 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +54.7 % | +12.6 % | −12.1 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +54.6 % | +12.6 % | −11.1 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +53.5 % | +12.4 % | −10.3 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +53.2 % | +12.3 % | −11.7 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +52.7 % | +12.2 % | −9.8 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +51.6 % | +12.0 % | −11.4 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +51.6 % | +12.0 % | −11.4 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +51.6 % | +12.0 % | −11.4 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +51.5 % | +12.0 % | −11.1 % |
| Burns Margarita | +48.9 % | +11.5 % | −10.8 % |
| Global market portfolio | +48.5 % | +11.4 % | −10.2 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +48.3 % | +11.3 % | −10.7 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +48.3 % | +11.3 % | −10.7 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +47.7 % | +11.2 % | −10.5 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +47.7 % | +11.2 % | −10.5 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +46.6 % | +11.0 % | −10.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +46.6 % | +11.0 % | −10.3 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +43.1 % | +10.3 % | −9.8 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +43.1 % | +10.3 % | −9.8 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +43.1 % | +10.3 % | −9.8 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +42.1 % | +10.0 % | −12.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +40.7 % | +9.8 % | −10.0 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +40.6 % | +9.7 % | −10.9 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +35.7 % | +8.7 % | −10.8 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +33.7 % | +8.3 % | −11.2 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +32.1 % | +7.9 % | −11.7 % |
Great bull market in stocks and bonds 1982-08 – 1999-12 Regime
Disinflation, falling interest rates, globalisation, the personal-computer and internet booms and strong corporate profits drove an unusually long bull market in both stocks and bonds, with only brief interruptions (1987, 1990, 1994, 1998). Bond yields fell from the 1981 peak of over 15 percent to roughly 4.5-6.5 percent. Gold and commodities were weak for most of the period.
Key events
- 1982-08-12: Dow bottom at about 777, start of the bull
- 1987-10-19: Black Monday
- 1989-12: Nikkei peaks near 38,900; Japanese bubble then bursts
- 1991-12: Soviet Union dissolves
- 1999-03: Dow closes above 10,000 for the first time
Market facts
- The Fed's essay covers the Volcker disinflation that set up the bull market. www.federalreservehistory.org
- NBER dates recessions only in 1990-91 during this period (July 1990 to March 1991). www.nber.org
- Gold hit multi-decade lows near $250 in 1999. en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- US large companies (S&P 500). Excellent returns; one of the best equity periods on record.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Large capital gains plus high coupons as yields fell from the 1981 peak.
- Intermediate government bonds (10 y). Strong.
- Corporate bonds. Strong with falling yields.
- Emerging markets. Opened to investors from 1988 (MSCI EM); volatile but available in later years of the era.
What failed
- Gold. Declined for most of the period, bottoming near $250 around 1999.
- Commodities. Largely flat to negative in real terms.
- Developed markets outside the US. Japan's post-1989 bust dragged on the international index in the 1990s.
All models in this era (50)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merriman two funds | +2133.7 % | +19.5 % | −30.6 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +2060.4 % | +19.3 % | −29.9 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +2060.4 % | +19.3 % | −29.9 % |
| Four Corners | +1939.2 % | +18.9 % | −30.2 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +1743.1 % | +18.2 % | −27.4 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +1513.4 % | +17.3 % | −23.8 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +1506.2 % | +17.3 % | −23.7 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +1446.3 % | +17.0 % | −31.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +1414.6 % | +16.9 % | −27.5 % |
| Second-Grader's | +1407.3 % | +16.9 % | −27.5 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +1344.0 % | +16.6 % | −21.1 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +1320.3 % | +16.5 % | −26.7 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +1271.6 % | +16.2 % | −25.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +1255.3 % | +16.1 % | −25.2 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +1246.5 % | +16.1 % | −26.4 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +1219.2 % | +16.0 % | −23.7 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +1211.7 % | +15.9 % | −23.8 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +1105.2 % | +15.4 % | −20.9 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +1102.4 % | +15.3 % | −22.6 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +1088.2 % | +15.3 % | −16.7 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +1077.8 % | +15.2 % | −16.5 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +1070.9 % | +15.2 % | −20.1 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +1051.4 % | +15.1 % | −19.5 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +1037.2 % | +15.0 % | −19.5 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +1025.3 % | +14.9 % | −19.6 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +1020.0 % | +14.9 % | −19.2 % |
| Coffeehouse | +1019.1 % | +14.9 % | −18.0 % |
| CalPERS | +1011.6 % | +14.8 % | −19.6 % |
| Burns Margarita | +1006.3 % | +14.8 % | −21.6 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +994.1 % | +14.7 % | −19.6 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +977.6 % | +14.6 % | −24.3 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +972.3 % | +14.6 % | −20.3 % |
| Global market portfolio | +970.3 % | +14.6 % | −17.7 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +963.8 % | +14.5 % | −19.3 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +934.8 % | +14.4 % | −19.0 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +932.6 % | +14.3 % | −11.4 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +890.0 % | +14.1 % | −18.1 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +872.9 % | +14.0 % | −18.5 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +856.6 % | +13.8 % | −20.7 % |
| Gone Fishin' | +846.8 % | +13.8 % | −20.5 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +833.9 % | +13.7 % | −13.7 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +802.2 % | +13.5 % | −16.6 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +770.1 % | +13.2 % | −10.7 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +761.6 % | +13.2 % | −9.7 % |
| Talmud thirds | +746.2 % | +13.0 % | −15.7 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +741.4 % | +13.0 % | −9.9 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +650.7 % | +12.3 % | −7.9 % |
| Golden Butterfly | +639.3 % | +12.2 % | −13.0 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | +393.3 % | +9.6 % | −7.7 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +235.2 % | +7.2 % | −3.1 % |
Black Monday 1987-08 – 1987-12 Stress window
After a strong rally in 1987, the Dow fell 22.6 percent on 19 October 1987, the largest one-day percentage fall on record. Concerns about higher rates, a falling dollar and program trading ('portfolio insurance') played roles. The Fed supplied liquidity, and the economy kept growing; stock markets recovered within about two years.
Key events
- 1987-08-25: S&P 500 peak
- 1987-10-19: Black Monday, Dow -22.6 percent in one day
- 1987-10-20: Fed says it stands ready to supply liquidity
- 1987-12-04: S&P 500 closing low
- 1988: recovery begins
Market facts
- The Dow fell 22.6 percent on 19 October 1987. www.federalreservehistory.org
- The S&P 500 lost about 20 percent that day. en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Treasuries rallied as investors sought safety.
- Short-term government bonds. Stable, plus flight-to-quality bid.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Safe.
What failed
- US large companies (S&P 500). Large drawdown (about -34 percent peak to trough in the S&P 500 over three and a half months, widely quoted).
- US small companies. Fell sharply and recovered more slowly than large caps.
All models in this era (60)
Savings-and-loan crisis and 1990 recession 1990-07 – 1991-03 Stress window
A commercial real-estate bust and the savings-and-loan crisis tightened credit, and Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August 1990 caused an oil price spike and a drop in confidence. The US entered a mild recession and the S&P 500 fell around 20 percent. Stocks surged once the Gulf War began in January 1991, and the Fed cut rates substantially.
Key events
- 1990-07: NBER business-cycle peak
- 1990-08-02: Iraq invades Kuwait; oil prices spike
- 1990-10: S&P 500 low
- 1991-01-17: Operation Desert Storm begins; stocks rally
- 1991-03: NBER trough
Market facts
- NBER dates the recession from July 1990 to March 1991. www.nber.org
- The Fed's essay on the S&L crisis covers the failure of hundreds of thrifts and the 1989 resolution legislation. www.federalreservehistory.org
What worked
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Treasuries benefited from falling rates and flight to safety.
- Intermediate government bonds (10 y). Positive.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Fine.
What failed
- US small companies. Small caps and credit-sensitive stocks suffered with tight lending.
- Real estate (REITs). US real estate was hit by the bust.
- US large companies (S&P 500). About -20 percent peak to trough in the S&P 500 (quoted from general sources).
All models in this era (60)
1994 bond market massacre 1994-02 – 1994-12 Stress window
The Fed unexpectedly started raising rates in February 1994, doubling the federal funds rate from 3 to 6 percent by February 1995, and long-term yields jumped. It is often described as one of the worst bond markets of the post-war era. Derivative losses (Orange County, December 1994) and the Mexican peso crisis added to the stress, while US stocks ended the year roughly flat.
Key events
- 1994-02-04: Fed hikes by 25 bp, first move after a long pause
- 1994: Fed hikes six times in total, taking the funds rate to 5.5 percent
- 1994-12-06: Orange County files for bankruptcy after derivative losses
- 1994-12-20: Mexico devalues the peso (tequila crisis)
- 1995-02: Final hike to 6 percent
Market facts
- The Fed's published history documents the 1994 tightening cycle that raised the funds rate from 3 to 6 percent. www.federalreservehistory.org
- Wikipedia covers the 1994 bond market crisis. en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- Cash (Treasury bills). Rising T-bill yields; the safest holding.
- Short-term government bonds. Mild price damage.
- US large companies (S&P 500). Roughly flat (price down slightly, total return slightly positive).
What failed
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Large losses as long yields rose sharply.
- Intermediate government bonds (10 y). Material losses.
- Corporate bonds. Losses.
- Emerging markets. Hit by the tequila crisis in December 1994.
All models in this era (60)
Asian and Russian financial crises 1997-07 – 1998-10 Stress window
The Thai baht devaluation of July 1997 started a wave of currency and banking crises across Asia, followed by Russia's default and devaluation in August 1998. The hedge fund LTCM nearly failed and was recapitalised under Fed auspices in September 1998. US stocks dipped about 19 percent in mid-1998 but recovered by year-end after the Fed cut rates three times.
Key events
- 1997-07-02: Thailand floats the baht
- 1997-10-27: Dow falls 7.2 percent; trading curbs triggered
- 1998-08-17: Russia devalues the rouble and defaults on domestic debt
- 1998-09-23: LTCM rescue by banks, organised by the New York Fed
- 1998-09 to 1998-11: Fed cuts rates three times
Market facts
- The Fed's essay describes the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98. www.federalreservehistory.org
- The Fed's essay describes the Russian crisis of 1998 and the LTCM fallout. www.federalreservehistory.org
- The S&P 500 fell nearly 20 percent from July to October 1998 (widely cited). en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Treasuries rallied on flight to safety.
- Intermediate government bonds (10 y). Positive.
- US large companies (S&P 500). Large US growth stocks recovered quickly and led through 1999.
What failed
- Emerging markets. Hit hard; Asian and Russian markets collapsed.
- Commodities. Fell with weak Asian demand; oil trough in late 1998.
- Corporate bonds. Spreads widened sharply in autumn 1998.
- US small companies. Lagged large caps; small caps fell more in 1998.
All models in this era (60)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graham 25/75 | +23.7 % | +17.3 % | −2.4 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +23.3 % | +17.0 % | −7.2 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +22.9 % | +16.7 % | −12.4 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +22.4 % | +16.4 % | −17.3 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +22.4 % | +16.4 % | −17.3 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +21.3 % | +15.6 % | −15.6 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +20.5 % | +15.0 % | −12.8 % |
| Dalio All Seasons | +20.3 % | +14.8 % | −4.1 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +20.1 % | +14.7 % | −11.4 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +19.1 % | +14.0 % | −5.9 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +18.6 % | +13.7 % | −8.1 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +15.1 % | +11.1 % | −8.9 % |
| Burns Margarita | +14.9 % | +11.0 % | −8.6 % |
| Coffeehouse | +14.7 % | +10.8 % | −9.7 % |
| Second-Grader's | +14.6 % | +10.8 % | −13.7 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +14.3 % | +10.6 % | −9.5 % |
| Merriman two funds | +14.2 % | +10.4 % | −21.5 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +13.9 % | +10.2 % | −3.3 % |
| Four Corners | +13.4 % | +9.9 % | −21.9 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +13.3 % | +9.8 % | −3.5 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +13.2 % | +9.7 % | −12.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +12.8 % | +9.5 % | −1.8 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +12.6 % | +9.3 % | −14.1 % |
| Golden Butterfly | +12.1 % | +9.0 % | −8.2 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +12.0 % | +8.9 % | −10.0 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | +11.8 % | +8.8 % | −4.0 % |
| Global market portfolio | +11.6 % | +8.6 % | −8.7 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +11.2 % | +8.3 % | −5.7 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +11.1 % | +8.2 % | −5.8 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +10.4 % | +7.7 % | −9.2 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +10.1 % | +7.5 % | −10.1 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +10.1 % | +7.4 % | −9.9 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +9.7 % | +7.2 % | −11.1 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +9.6 % | +7.1 % | −11.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +9.6 % | +7.1 % | −9.6 % |
| Faber GAA | +9.3 % | +6.9 % | −6.0 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +9.1 % | +6.8 % | −10.6 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +9.0 % | +6.7 % | −12.4 % |
| ABP (Netherlands) | +8.9 % | +6.6 % | −8.6 % |
| Talmud thirds | +8.6 % | +6.4 % | −11.1 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +8.4 % | +6.2 % | −11.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +8.3 % | +6.2 % | −15.2 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +7.9 % | +5.9 % | −13.4 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +7.9 % | +5.9 % | −14.2 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +7.8 % | +5.8 % | −13.9 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +7.6 % | +5.7 % | −20.3 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +7.5 % | +5.6 % | −11.1 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +7.5 % | +5.6 % | −9.5 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +7.4 % | +5.5 % | −13.7 % |
| RPAR risk parity | +6.8 % | +5.1 % | −5.4 % |
| CalPERS | +6.6 % | +4.9 % | −12.3 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +6.1 % | +4.6 % | −2.0 % |
| Faber Ivy (static) | +5.4 % | +4.1 % | −10.9 % |
| CalSTRS | +5.2 % | +3.9 % | −13.7 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +5.0 % | +3.8 % | −13.5 % |
| Stanford endowment | +3.1 % | +2.3 % | −17.6 % |
| Gone Fishin' | +1.8 % | +1.3 % | −13.4 % |
| 7Twelve (Israelsen) | +0.2 % | +0.2 % | −12.8 % |
| Equal weight 1/N | −1.8 % | −1.4 % | −12.6 % |
| Harvard endowment | −2.2 % | −1.6 % | −16.3 % |
Dot-com bubble and crash 2000-03 – 2002-10 Stress window
Technology and telecom valuations collapsed from the March 2000 peak; the Nasdaq Composite lost about 78 percent by October 2002 and the S&P 500 about half. A mild recession (March-November 2001), the September 2001 attacks and accounting scandals (Enron, WorldCom) added to the stress. Value stocks, small-cap value, REITs, bonds and gold all did well relative to growth.
Key events
- 2000-03-10: Nasdaq Composite peak, about 5,048
- 2000-05: Fed's last hike in the cycle, funds rate 6.5 percent
- 2001-01 to 2001-12: Fed cuts the funds rate from 6.5 to 1.75 percent
- 2001-09-11: attacks close US markets for four trading days
- 2002-10-09: S&P 500 and Nasdaq closing lows
Market facts
- The S&P 500 fell about 49 percent from March 2000 to October 2002. en.wikipedia.org
- The Nasdaq Composite fell about 78 percent from peak to trough. en.wikipedia.org
- NBER dates the recession from March to November 2001. www.nber.org
What worked
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Treasuries gained as yields fell.
- Intermediate government bonds (10 y). Positive.
- Real estate (REITs). REITs posted gains while stocks fell.
- Gold. Began its long bull market, rising from about $255 in 2001.
- US small companies. Small-cap value held up much better than large growth.
- Inflation-protected bonds (TIPS). Positive, moderate.
What failed
- US large companies (S&P 500). Roughly -49 percent peak to trough (S&P 500).
- US large growth stocks. Much worse than blend: Nasdaq about -78 percent.
- Emerging markets. Fell with global stocks, then led the 2003 recovery.
- Corporate bonds. Spreads widened in 2002 amid corporate scandals and downgrades.
All models in this era (60)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +21.7 % | +7.6 % | −3.6 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +16.2 % | +5.8 % | −3.2 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +11.6 % | +4.2 % | −2.5 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +10.4 % | +3.8 % | −7.7 % |
| Coffeehouse | +9.0 % | +3.3 % | −7.2 % |
| Golden Butterfly | +7.8 % | +2.8 % | −6.4 % |
| Dalio All Seasons | +7.7 % | +2.8 % | −5.1 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +6.9 % | +2.5 % | −2.3 % |
| RPAR risk parity | +6.0 % | +2.2 % | −6.1 % |
| ABP (Netherlands) | +4.4 % | +1.6 % | −6.0 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +3.8 % | +1.4 % | −3.6 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | +1.5 % | +0.6 % | −6.0 % |
| Talmud thirds | +1.5 % | +0.6 % | −10.4 % |
| Faber GAA | +1.1 % | +0.4 % | −6.4 % |
| Faber Ivy (static) | +0.6 % | +0.2 % | −11.7 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | −1.9 % | −0.7 % | −12.4 % |
| 7Twelve (Israelsen) | −2.1 % | −0.8 % | −11.2 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | −3.0 % | −1.1 % | −8.8 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | −3.1 % | −1.2 % | −7.6 % |
| Equal weight 1/N | −3.4 % | −1.3 % | −9.7 % |
| Graham 50/50 | −3.8 % | −1.4 % | −12.2 % |
| Global market portfolio | −5.1 % | −1.9 % | −9.7 % |
| Bengen for retirees | −5.3 % | −2.0 % | −9.3 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | −5.7 % | −2.2 % | −12.0 % |
| CalPERS | −6.7 % | −2.6 % | −11.6 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | −7.2 % | −2.8 % | −13.7 % |
| CalSTRS | −7.3 % | −2.8 % | −12.3 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | −7.4 % | −2.9 % | −12.3 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | −8.1 % | −3.1 % | −12.1 % |
| Harvard endowment | −8.4 % | −3.2 % | −15.1 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | −8.6 % | −3.3 % | −15.8 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | −8.9 % | −3.5 % | −14.9 % |
| Merriman two funds | −11.4 % | −4.4 % | −24.9 % |
| Four Corners | −11.6 % | −4.5 % | −27.4 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | −11.8 % | −4.6 % | −18.1 % |
| Stanford endowment | −12.5 % | −4.9 % | −15.2 % |
| Gone Fishin' | −13.9 % | −5.5 % | −16.2 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | −15.5 % | −6.1 % | −20.1 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | −15.8 % | −6.2 % | −21.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | −16.0 % | −6.3 % | −21.0 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | −16.5 % | −6.6 % | −24.0 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | −17.0 % | −6.7 % | −22.0 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | −19.1 % | −7.6 % | −24.3 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | −19.5 % | −7.8 % | −24.3 % |
| Burns Margarita | −20.9 % | −8.4 % | −25.7 % |
| Graham 75/25 | −21.6 % | −8.7 % | −29.5 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | −21.6 % | −8.7 % | −24.6 % |
| Ferri Core Four | −22.2 % | −9.0 % | −28.1 % |
| Collins 75/25 | −23.7 % | −9.7 % | −31.4 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | −25.0 % | −10.2 % | −30.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | −27.1 % | −11.2 % | −32.3 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | −28.0 % | −11.6 % | −33.6 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | −28.5 % | −11.8 % | −33.5 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | −29.9 % | −12.5 % | −35.4 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | −32.3 % | −13.6 % | −40.0 % |
| Ramsey four funds | −32.4 % | −13.7 % | −35.9 % |
| Second-Grader's | −33.3 % | −14.1 % | −39.5 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | −33.4 % | −14.1 % | −39.3 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | −37.2 % | −16.0 % | −45.0 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | −37.2 % | −16.0 % | −45.0 % |
Recovery and housing boom 2002-11 – 2007-09 Regime
After the 2002 lows, easy money (funds rate at 1 percent until mid-2004), cheap credit and rising house prices drove global growth. Emerging markets, commodities, real estate and value stocks led while the dollar weakened; the Fed then raised rates 17 times to 5.25 percent by June 2006. US house prices peaked around 2006, but equity markets continued to a record in October 2007.
Key events
- 2003-06: Fed cuts to 1 percent, the lowest in decades
- 2004-06 to 2006-06: Fed raises rates 17 times to 5.25 percent
- 2006: US house prices peak (Case-Shiller national index, mid-2006)
- 2007-02: HSBC's subprime losses; New Century Financial in trouble
- 2007-07/08: Two Bear Stearns funds collapse; credit markets seize up
Market facts
- The Fed's essay describes the run-up to the financial crisis, including low rates and mortgage credit expansion. www.federalreservehistory.org
- Wikipedia documents the 2000s US housing bubble. en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- Emerging markets. Outstanding returns in this era.
- Real estate (REITs). Strong, led by real-estate optimism.
- Commodities. Rose sharply (oil from about $30 to $90 by 2007).
- Gold. Rose steadily.
- Developed markets outside the US. Outperformed US stocks, helped by the weak dollar.
- US small companies. Strong; small-cap value in particular.
What failed
- Cash (Treasury bills). Low real returns in the early years.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Modest returns; yields moved little.
- Short-term government bonds. Modest.
All models in this era (60)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard endowment | +143.1 % | +19.8 % | −4.0 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +138.8 % | +19.4 % | −9.1 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +133.2 % | +18.8 % | −7.0 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +133.0 % | +18.8 % | −6.2 % |
| Faber Ivy (static) | +131.4 % | +18.6 % | −4.4 % |
| Four Corners | +129.9 % | +18.5 % | −11.0 % |
| Equal weight 1/N | +126.7 % | +18.1 % | −4.5 % |
| Merriman two funds | +125.7 % | +18.0 % | −9.0 % |
| Gone Fishin' | +123.9 % | +17.8 % | −4.4 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +122.6 % | +17.7 % | −5.8 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +120.6 % | +17.5 % | −5.8 % |
| 7Twelve (Israelsen) | +120.5 % | +17.5 % | −3.9 % |
| Stanford endowment | +120.2 % | +17.4 % | −4.7 % |
| CalSTRS | +115.7 % | +16.9 % | −5.2 % |
| Second-Grader's | +115.5 % | +16.9 % | −7.2 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +111.8 % | +16.5 % | −6.8 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +111.4 % | +16.4 % | −5.2 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +110.7 % | +16.4 % | −5.1 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +110.3 % | +16.3 % | −5.8 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +109.4 % | +16.2 % | −4.1 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +108.9 % | +16.2 % | −4.8 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +107.0 % | +15.9 % | −5.2 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +105.6 % | +15.8 % | −4.5 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +105.1 % | +15.7 % | −6.1 % |
| CalPERS | +104.7 % | +15.7 % | −4.8 % |
| ABP (Netherlands) | +101.4 % | +15.3 % | −5.6 % |
| Burns Margarita | +100.9 % | +15.2 % | −3.8 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +98.5 % | +15.0 % | −3.9 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +97.0 % | +14.8 % | −9.6 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +97.0 % | +14.8 % | −9.6 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +93.2 % | +14.3 % | −3.8 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +92.4 % | +14.2 % | −3.6 % |
| RPAR risk parity | +91.7 % | +14.2 % | −4.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +91.4 % | +14.1 % | −3.3 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +90.2 % | +14.0 % | −4.9 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +90.1 % | +14.0 % | −3.3 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +89.9 % | +13.9 % | −4.5 % |
| Faber GAA | +89.1 % | +13.8 % | −4.2 % |
| Talmud thirds | +89.1 % | +13.8 % | −6.7 % |
| Coffeehouse | +88.3 % | +13.7 % | −5.4 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +87.1 % | +13.6 % | −8.4 % |
| Global market portfolio | +85.5 % | +13.4 % | −4.1 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +84.1 % | +13.2 % | −3.3 % |
| Golden Butterfly | +81.8 % | +12.9 % | −5.1 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +78.3 % | +12.5 % | −3.4 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +76.0 % | +12.2 % | −6.0 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +74.9 % | +12.0 % | −3.7 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +74.6 % | +12.0 % | −5.5 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +72.2 % | +11.7 % | −4.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +66.5 % | +10.9 % | −2.8 % |
| Dalio All Seasons | +65.1 % | +10.7 % | −5.3 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | +64.9 % | +10.7 % | −4.5 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +63.4 % | +10.5 % | −5.6 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +56.5 % | +9.5 % | −2.6 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +54.9 % | +9.3 % | −3.2 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +54.7 % | +9.3 % | −3.1 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +53.8 % | +9.2 % | −3.4 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +42.3 % | +7.4 % | −3.0 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +34.6 % | +6.2 % | −5.1 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +25.0 % | +4.6 % | −0.7 % |
Global financial crisis 2007-10 – 2009-03 Stress window
The US housing bust turned into a banking crisis that peaked with the Lehman Brothers failure in September 2008. Stocks fell almost 57 percent from the October 2007 peak to the March 2009 low, credit froze, and the economy suffered the deepest recession since the 1930s. The Fed cut to zero, launched quantitative easing and Congress passed TARP.
Key events
- 2007-10-09: S&P 500 closing high at about 1,565
- 2008-03: Bear Stearns rescued by JPMorgan with Fed support
- 2008-09-15: Lehman Brothers files for bankruptcy; AIG rescued the next day
- 2008-12-16: Fed cuts the funds rate to 0-0.25 percent
- 2009-03-09: S&P 500 closing low at about 677
Market facts
- The S&P 500 fell about 56.8 percent from 9 October 2007 to 9 March 2009 (closing basis). en.wikipedia.org
- NBER dates the recession from December 2007 to June 2009. www.nber.org
- The Fed's essay describes the crisis and policy response. www.federalreservehistory.org
What worked
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Long Treasuries rallied strongly in late 2008 as yields fell.
- Intermediate government bonds (10 y). Positive.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Safe.
- Inflation-protected bonds (TIPS). Mixed: deflation fears cut TIPS prices in late 2008 despite the safety bid.
- Gold. Held value relatively well and was positive through the window.
What failed
- US large companies (S&P 500). About -57 percent peak to trough.
- US small companies. Similar or larger drawdown.
- Developed markets outside the US. Fell harder than the US in dollar terms.
- Emerging markets. Fell more than 50 percent.
- Real estate (REITs). Collapsed, with large losses.
- Commodities. Oil rose to a record of about $147 in July 2008 and then lost most of the gain by December.
- Corporate bonds. Spreads at record wides in late 2008.
All models in this era (60)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graham 25/75 | +4.2 % | +2.8 % | −8.9 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | +1.1 % | +0.7 % | −12.2 % |
| Dalio All Seasons | −0.2 % | −0.1 % | −12.1 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | −1.7 % | −1.1 % | −10.7 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | −3.2 % | −2.1 % | −5.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | −3.5 % | −2.3 % | −10.0 % |
| RPAR risk parity | −8.6 % | −5.8 % | −23.6 % |
| Target Retirement Income | −9.4 % | −6.4 % | −14.9 % |
| Golden Butterfly | −9.9 % | −6.7 % | −16.0 % |
| Graham 50/50 | −13.2 % | −9.0 % | −19.3 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | −15.8 % | −10.8 % | −20.7 % |
| Faber GAA | −17.2 % | −11.8 % | −23.0 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | −18.8 % | −12.9 % | −24.3 % |
| Bengen for retirees | −19.2 % | −13.3 % | −25.1 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | −19.6 % | −13.5 % | −24.4 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | −19.6 % | −13.6 % | −23.6 % |
| Global market portfolio | −23.0 % | −16.0 % | −28.7 % |
| Coffeehouse | −26.0 % | −18.2 % | −31.4 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | −26.2 % | −18.3 % | −31.2 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | −26.3 % | −18.4 % | −31.9 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | −26.4 % | −18.5 % | −32.0 % |
| Equal weight 1/N | −26.4 % | −18.5 % | −34.1 % |
| ABP (Netherlands) | −26.7 % | −18.7 % | −32.1 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | −27.2 % | −19.1 % | −33.1 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | −27.3 % | −19.1 % | −33.0 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | −28.6 % | −20.1 % | −34.0 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | −28.9 % | −20.3 % | −34.8 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | −29.1 % | −20.5 % | −33.9 % |
| 7Twelve (Israelsen) | −29.1 % | −20.5 % | −37.5 % |
| Graham 75/25 | −29.5 % | −20.8 % | −35.6 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | −30.4 % | −21.4 % | −36.6 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | −30.8 % | −21.8 % | −35.7 % |
| Burns Margarita | −31.1 % | −22.0 % | −37.3 % |
| Gone Fishin' | −31.3 % | −22.2 % | −37.3 % |
| Collins 75/25 | −32.5 % | −23.1 % | −38.0 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | −33.2 % | −23.6 % | −37.7 % |
| CalPERS | −33.4 % | −23.7 % | −38.3 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | −34.1 % | −24.3 % | −39.7 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | −34.3 % | −24.4 % | −40.2 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | −34.5 % | −24.6 % | −39.4 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | −35.0 % | −24.9 % | −40.1 % |
| Faber Ivy (static) | −35.2 % | −25.1 % | −43.2 % |
| Stanford endowment | −35.9 % | −25.7 % | −41.7 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | −36.0 % | −25.7 % | −40.4 % |
| Harvard endowment | −36.1 % | −25.8 % | −43.0 % |
| CalSTRS | −36.9 % | −26.4 % | −41.9 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | −37.0 % | −26.5 % | −43.1 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | −37.0 % | −26.5 % | −43.0 % |
| Talmud thirds | −37.9 % | −27.2 % | −41.1 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | −38.3 % | −27.5 % | −44.6 % |
| Ferri Core Four | −38.4 % | −27.6 % | −43.4 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | −39.5 % | −28.5 % | −44.9 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | −39.9 % | −28.8 % | −45.4 % |
| Second-Grader's | −41.9 % | −30.4 % | −47.3 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | −42.0 % | −30.5 % | −48.1 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | −44.7 % | −32.6 % | −50.3 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | −44.7 % | −32.6 % | −50.3 % |
| Ramsey four funds | −47.2 % | −34.7 % | −52.7 % |
| Merriman two funds | −48.2 % | −35.5 % | −53.4 % |
| Four Corners | −49.6 % | −36.7 % | −55.1 % |
The decade after the crisis 2009-04 – 2019-12 Regime
The longest US expansion on record (June 2009 to February 2020, 128 months), with near-zero policy rates until December 2015, three rounds of quantitative easing, low inflation and low volatility. US large-cap growth stocks led, international and emerging markets lagged, commodities and gold peaked in 2011 and then declined. Brief scares came from the euro-zone debt crisis, the US credit downgrade (2011), the 2013 taper tantrum, China/oil in 2015-16 and the fourth quarter of 2018.
Key events
- 2009-03: QE1 starts; stocks bottom on 9 March
- 2011-08: S&P cuts the US credit rating from AAA; euro-zone debt crisis
- 2012-07-26: ECB President Draghi: 'whatever it takes'
- 2013-05: taper tantrum
- 2015-12-16: Fed's first rate hike since 2006
Market facts
- NBER dates the expansion from June 2009 to February 2020. www.nber.org
- The Fed's essay describes the policy response and its aftermath. www.federalreservehistory.org
- S&P 500 gained roughly 400 percent in price terms from March 2009 to February 2020 (from about 677 to about 3,386). en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- US large companies (S&P 500). Strong, steady returns with low volatility.
- US large growth stocks. Led, especially technology and large internet companies.
- Real estate (REITs). Strong most years.
- US bond market (aggregate). Steady, positive returns as rates fell and QE compressed yields.
What failed
- Commodities. Fell sharply from 2011 peaks and again in 2014-16 as oil fell below $30.
- Gold. Peaked around September 2011 and fell about 45 percent to the December 2015 low (approximate).
- Emerging markets. Lagged the US; strong 2009-10 then largely sideways to down.
- Developed markets outside the US. Lagged the US, especially after 2011.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Near-zero yields meant negative real returns.
All models in this era (60)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Siegel: all US stocks | +411.2 % | +16.4 % | −17.7 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +411.2 % | +16.4 % | −17.7 % |
| Merriman two funds | +393.7 % | +16.0 % | −21.5 % |
| Four Corners | +382.3 % | +15.8 % | −23.3 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +343.8 % | +14.9 % | −16.0 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +339.2 % | +14.8 % | −21.8 % |
| Second-Grader's | +285.5 % | +13.4 % | −17.0 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +285.1 % | +13.4 % | −12.3 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +282.0 % | +13.3 % | −10.5 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +279.6 % | +13.2 % | −10.5 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +276.2 % | +13.1 % | −17.5 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +273.9 % | +13.1 % | −16.6 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +261.4 % | +12.7 % | −14.5 % |
| CalSTRS | +246.5 % | +12.3 % | −13.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +242.8 % | +12.1 % | −15.6 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +240.9 % | +12.1 % | −15.4 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +239.9 % | +12.1 % | −15.3 % |
| Stanford endowment | +238.7 % | +12.0 % | −16.7 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +233.6 % | +11.9 % | −10.7 % |
| CalPERS | +232.8 % | +11.8 % | −12.4 % |
| Talmud thirds | +231.9 % | +11.8 % | −11.9 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +231.1 % | +11.8 % | −13.5 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +227.6 % | +11.7 % | −14.0 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +219.9 % | +11.4 % | −11.7 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +210.7 % | +11.1 % | −11.6 % |
| ABP (Netherlands) | +208.7 % | +11.1 % | −7.7 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +207.6 % | +11.0 % | −16.6 % |
| Coffeehouse | +199.8 % | +10.8 % | −9.2 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +198.2 % | +10.7 % | −11.6 % |
| Harvard endowment | +196.2 % | +10.6 % | −16.9 % |
| Gone Fishin' | +193.7 % | +10.5 % | −13.4 % |
| Faber Ivy (static) | +193.6 % | +10.5 % | −13.6 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +191.4 % | +10.5 % | −10.9 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +191.1 % | +10.5 % | −9.9 % |
| Global market portfolio | +189.3 % | +10.4 % | −7.7 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +186.1 % | +10.3 % | −6.9 % |
| Burns Margarita | +184.5 % | +10.2 % | −11.7 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +183.4 % | +10.2 % | −10.3 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +183.4 % | +10.2 % | −10.6 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +179.3 % | +10.0 % | −6.5 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +176.4 % | +9.9 % | −15.8 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +175.6 % | +9.9 % | −9.3 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +172.8 % | +9.8 % | −6.3 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +170.2 % | +9.7 % | −13.1 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +161.2 % | +9.3 % | −13.4 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +160.9 % | +9.3 % | −10.6 % |
| Faber GAA | +156.4 % | +9.2 % | −6.7 % |
| 7Twelve (Israelsen) | +155.8 % | +9.1 % | −14.0 % |
| Equal weight 1/N | +153.7 % | +9.0 % | −12.0 % |
| Golden Butterfly | +153.6 % | +9.0 % | −6.5 % |
| Dalio All Seasons | +143.6 % | +8.6 % | −6.5 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +134.8 % | +8.3 % | −5.9 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +133.5 % | +8.2 % | −7.0 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | +109.6 % | +7.1 % | −6.8 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +107.7 % | +7.0 % | −3.9 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +99.3 % | +6.6 % | −5.0 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +97.8 % | +6.6 % | −5.1 % |
| RPAR risk parity | +94.4 % | +6.4 % | −13.2 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +87.8 % | +6.0 % | −3.0 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +25.2 % | +2.1 % | −2.8 % |
Fourth-quarter 2018 sell-off 2018-09 – 2018-12 Stress window
US stocks dropped almost 20 percent in a little over three months as the Fed continued to raise rates and shrink its balance sheet, trade tensions between the US and China escalated and growth worries mounted. The S&P 500 fell about 19.8 percent from 20 September to 24 December, then rebounded sharply when the Fed signalled patience in January 2019.
Key events
- 2018-09-20: S&P 500 closing high
- 2018-10: global equity sell-off; trade tensions
- 2018-12-19: Fed raises the funds rate to 2.25-2.50 percent
- 2018-12-24: S&P 500 closing low
- 2019-01-04: Powell signals flexibility on rates and balance sheet; rebound
Market facts
- The S&P 500 fell about 19.8 percent from 20 Sept to 24 Dec 2018 (closing basis). en.wikipedia.org
- Wikipedia covers the Fed's December 2018 hike and market response. en.wikipedia.org
What worked
- Intermediate government bonds (10 y). Treasuries rose as yields fell in December.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Positive in the quarter.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Safe.
What failed
- US large companies (S&P 500). About -20 percent peak to trough.
- US small companies. Fell more than large caps.
- Corporate bonds. High-yield and credit spreads widened.
- Commodities. Oil fell by roughly a third in Q4 (approximate).
All models in this era (60)
Covid crash and stimulus boom 2020-02 – 2021-12 Regime
The pandemic caused the fastest bear market on record (S&P 500 down about 34 percent in 33 days to 23 March 2020) and a two-month recession. Unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus (CARES Act, near-zero rates, large asset purchases) fueled a rapid recovery, retail trading booms, SPACs and meme stocks in 2021, and a surge in inflation from spring 2021 as supply chains were strained.
Key events
- 2020-02-19: S&P 500 peak; NBER peak in February 2020
- 2020-03-15: Fed cuts to 0-0.25 percent; 2020-03-23: Fed announces open-ended QE; S&P low that day
- 2020-03-27: CARES Act signed, about $2.2 trillion
- 2020-04-20: front-month WTI crude future settles negative
- 2021-12: US CPI inflation about 7 percent year on year; Fed signals faster tightening
Market facts
- The S&P 500 fell about 33.9 percent from 19 February to 23 March 2020 (closing basis). en.wikipedia.org
- NBER dates the recession from February to April 2020. www.nber.org
- US CPI inflation was 7.0 percent year on year in December 2021 (BLS). www.bls.gov
What worked
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Treasuries rallied in early 2020 (with a brief liquidity dislocation in mid-March).
- Gold. Rose to a record above $2,000 in August 2020.
- US large growth stocks. Technology and growth stocks dominated 2020-21.
- Real estate (REITs). Recovered strongly in 2021.
- Commodities. Rebounded strongly in 2021 as demand returned (oil to the $80s).
What failed
- Cash (Treasury bills). Near-zero yields meant negative real returns once inflation rose in 2021.
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Yields began rising in 2021; real returns negative.
- Corporate bonds. Spreads blew out in March 2020, then recovered after Fed backstops.
- Real estate (REITs). Collapsed in March 2020.
- Commodities. Oil collapsed in spring 2020.
All models in this era (60)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merriman two funds | +58.4 % | +27.1 % | −27.3 % |
| Four Corners | +53.8 % | +25.2 % | −29.7 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | +53.6 % | +25.1 % | −20.2 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | +53.6 % | +25.1 % | −20.2 % |
| Ramsey four funds | +48.5 % | +22.9 % | −23.7 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | +48.0 % | +22.7 % | −18.0 % |
| Collins 75/25 | +40.1 % | +19.2 % | −14.8 % |
| Second-Grader's | +40.0 % | +19.2 % | −18.4 % |
| Graham 75/25 | +39.6 % | +19.0 % | −12.9 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | +39.2 % | +18.8 % | −18.2 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | +38.5 % | +18.5 % | −18.4 % |
| Stanford endowment | +37.2 % | +18.0 % | −18.6 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | +36.1 % | +17.4 % | −14.9 % |
| Ferri Core Four | +35.1 % | +17.0 % | −16.5 % |
| Harvard endowment | +34.9 % | +16.9 % | −19.6 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | +34.5 % | +16.7 % | −16.6 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | +34.0 % | +16.5 % | −16.9 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | +33.8 % | +16.4 % | −16.3 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | +33.8 % | +16.4 % | −16.2 % |
| CalSTRS | +32.6 % | +15.9 % | −16.4 % |
| Faber Ivy (static) | +32.5 % | +15.8 % | −17.9 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | +32.2 % | +15.7 % | −15.1 % |
| Burns Margarita | +31.2 % | +15.2 % | −14.0 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | +30.8 % | +15.1 % | −15.9 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | +30.8 % | +15.0 % | −14.0 % |
| 7Twelve (Israelsen) | +30.5 % | +14.9 % | −16.8 % |
| CalPERS | +30.1 % | +14.7 % | −15.1 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | +29.4 % | +14.4 % | −14.0 % |
| Talmud thirds | +29.2 % | +14.3 % | −14.9 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | +29.1 % | +14.3 % | −13.4 % |
| Gone Fishin' | +29.0 % | +14.2 % | −15.2 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | +28.2 % | +13.8 % | −12.9 % |
| Equal weight 1/N | +27.8 % | +13.7 % | −14.7 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | +27.7 % | +13.6 % | −11.8 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | +27.7 % | +13.6 % | −14.4 % |
| Coffeehouse | +27.6 % | +13.6 % | −12.6 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | +27.4 % | +13.5 % | −17.2 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | +27.3 % | +13.4 % | −12.3 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | +27.3 % | +13.4 % | −9.5 % |
| Bengen for retirees | +26.9 % | +13.2 % | −9.4 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | +26.8 % | +13.2 % | −14.7 % |
| Golden Butterfly | +26.5 % | +13.1 % | −7.2 % |
| Graham 50/50 | +26.4 % | +13.0 % | −5.8 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | +26.3 % | +12.9 % | −11.8 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | +26.3 % | +12.9 % | −12.1 % |
| ABP (Netherlands) | +25.9 % | +12.8 % | −11.6 % |
| Global market portfolio | +25.4 % | +12.5 % | −10.7 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | +24.2 % | +12.0 % | −12.8 % |
| RPAR risk parity | +23.7 % | +11.7 % | −8.8 % |
| Dalio All Seasons | +21.6 % | +10.8 % | −4.6 % |
| Faber GAA | +21.2 % | +10.6 % | −8.9 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | +20.5 % | +10.2 % | −11.9 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | +18.9 % | +9.4 % | −7.9 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | +18.4 % | +9.2 % | −7.9 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | +17.4 % | +8.7 % | −4.6 % |
| Target Retirement Income | +16.5 % | +8.3 % | −5.7 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | +14.0 % | +7.1 % | −2.3 % |
| Graham 25/75 | +13.8 % | +7.0 % | −3.7 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | +10.8 % | +5.5 % | −3.3 % |
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | +5.4 % | +2.8 % | −2.6 % |
Inflation shock and rate hikes 2022-01 – 2022-12 Stress window
US consumer inflation reached 9.1 percent in June 2022, the highest in four decades, driven by stimulus, supply shocks and the war in Ukraine. The Fed raised the funds rate from 0-0.25 to 4.25-4.50 percent in seven steps. Stocks and bonds fell together: the S&P 500 lost about 25 percent between January and October, and the bond market had its worst year in decades. Energy and commodities rose, and the dollar strengthened.
Key events
- 2022-02-24: Russia invades Ukraine; energy prices spike
- 2022-03-16: Fed begins hiking (25 bp)
- 2022-06: US CPI inflation 9.1 percent year on year; Fed's first 75 bp hike
- 2022-09/10: UK gilt market turmoil after the mini-budget
- 2022-12-14: Fed raises to 4.25-4.50 percent; 2022-10-12: S&P 500 closing low
Market facts
- The S&P 500 fell about 25.4 percent from 3 Jan to 12 Oct 2022 (closing basis). en.wikipedia.org
- US CPI inflation peaked at 9.1 percent year on year in June 2022 (BLS). www.bls.gov
- The Fed raised the federal funds target from 0-0.25 to 4.25-4.50 percent during 2022. www.federalreserve.gov
What worked
- Commodities. Energy-led commodity indices posted strong gains in 2022.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Positive nominal returns but negative real.
- Short-term government bonds. Smaller losses than longer bonds.
- US large value stocks. Held up much better than growth (qualitative).
What failed
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Worst year on record for long Treasuries by a wide margin.
- Intermediate government bonds (10 y). Large losses, the worst year in decades.
- US bond market (aggregate). Worst year on record for the broad US bond market.
- US large growth stocks. Fell much more than the broad market.
- Real estate (REITs). Large losses as rates rose.
- Inflation-protected bonds (TIPS). Down: real yields rose sharply.
- Developed markets outside the US. Fell in dollar terms; the strong dollar hurt.
- Gold. Roughly flat in dollars; fell in many other currencies.
All models in this era (60)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taleb barbell 90/10 | −0.4 % | −0.4 % | −1.9 % |
| Coward's Portfolio | −9.3 % | −9.3 % | −14.5 % |
| Four Corners | −9.7 % | −9.7 % | −17.5 % |
| RPAR risk parity | −9.9 % | −9.9 % | −14.5 % |
| Armstrong Ideal Index | −10.4 % | −10.4 % | −17.2 % |
| 7Twelve (Israelsen) | −10.8 % | −10.8 % | −15.1 % |
| DFA 60/40 value tilt | −10.8 % | −10.8 % | −16.1 % |
| Equal weight 1/N | −10.9 % | −10.9 % | −15.5 % |
| Golden Butterfly | −12.2 % | −12.2 % | −16.7 % |
| Permanent Portfolio | −12.3 % | −12.3 % | −15.8 % |
| Harvard endowment | −12.4 % | −12.4 % | −16.8 % |
| Merriman two funds | −13.1 % | −13.1 % | −19.9 % |
| Faber Ivy (static) | −13.2 % | −13.2 % | −18.5 % |
| Merriman Ultimate 60/40 | −13.2 % | −13.2 % | −18.9 % |
| Vanguard Wellesley | −13.6 % | −13.6 % | −18.6 % |
| Bernstein No-Brainer | −14.0 % | −14.0 % | −19.5 % |
| LifeStrategy 20/80 | −14.0 % | −14.0 % | −16.6 % |
| Coffeehouse | −14.4 % | −14.4 % | −19.2 % |
| Target Retirement Income | −14.5 % | −14.5 % | −17.7 % |
| Talmud thirds | −14.5 % | −14.5 % | −17.5 % |
| Swedroe Larry Portfolio | −14.9 % | −14.9 % | −17.9 % |
| Gone Fishin' | −15.0 % | −15.0 % | −20.7 % |
| LifeStrategy 40/60 | −15.1 % | −15.1 % | −18.9 % |
| Stanford endowment | −15.2 % | −15.2 % | −19.6 % |
| GPIF Japan 25/25/25/25 | −15.7 % | −15.7 % | −21.0 % |
| Burns Margarita | −15.7 % | −15.7 % | −22.0 % |
| LifeStrategy 60/40 | −16.1 % | −16.1 % | −21.0 % |
| Target Retirement 2030 | −16.1 % | −16.1 % | −21.1 % |
| Bengen for retirees | −16.3 % | −16.3 % | −19.8 % |
| Three-Fund (Bogleheads) | −16.3 % | −16.3 % | −21.1 % |
| iShares AOR 60/40 | −16.3 % | −16.3 % | −21.2 % |
| GIC Singapore 65/35 | −16.5 % | −16.5 % | −21.6 % |
| Couch Potato 50/50 | −16.5 % | −16.5 % | −19.6 % |
| Malkiel life-cycle (50s) | −16.7 % | −16.7 % | −21.5 % |
| Faber GAA | −16.7 % | −16.7 % | −21.0 % |
| Alaska Permanent Fund | −16.8 % | −16.8 % | −21.3 % |
| CalSTRS | −16.9 % | −16.9 % | −21.1 % |
| Target Retirement 2040 | −17.0 % | −17.0 % | −22.8 % |
| LifeStrategy 80/20 | −17.1 % | −17.1 % | −23.1 % |
| NZ Super 80/20 | −17.2 % | −17.2 % | −23.3 % |
| Graham 25/75 | −17.2 % | −17.2 % | −18.8 % |
| Fidelity Four-in-One | −17.3 % | −17.3 % | −23.4 % |
| Norway fund 70/30 | −17.5 % | −17.5 % | −23.3 % |
| CPP Canada 85/15 | −17.5 % | −17.5 % | −24.4 % |
| CalPERS | −17.6 % | −17.6 % | −21.9 % |
| Ramsey four funds | −17.6 % | −17.6 % | −24.1 % |
| Global market portfolio | −17.6 % | −17.6 % | −21.9 % |
| Target Retirement 2050 | −17.7 % | −17.7 % | −24.4 % |
| Second-Grader's | −17.8 % | −17.8 % | −24.5 % |
| Ferri Core Four | −17.8 % | −17.8 % | −23.6 % |
| Graham 50/50 | −18.1 % | −18.1 % | −20.8 % |
| Collins 75/25 | −18.2 % | −18.2 % | −22.2 % |
| Buffett 90/10 | −18.3 % | −18.3 % | −22.8 % |
| Swensen (Yale model) | −18.4 % | −18.4 % | −23.0 % |
| Graham 75/25 | −19.0 % | −19.0 % | −22.8 % |
| ABP (Netherlands) | −19.0 % | −19.0 % | −22.8 % |
| Vanguard Wellington | −19.2 % | −19.2 % | −23.6 % |
| Dalio All Seasons | −19.6 % | −19.6 % | −21.7 % |
| Siegel: all US stocks | −19.9 % | −19.9 % | −24.8 % |
| S&P 500, buy and hold | −19.9 % | −19.9 % | −24.8 % |
Higher-for-longer, AI boom and tariff shock 2023-01 – 2026-10 Regime
Rates stayed high into 2024 while inflation cooled and the economy avoided recession. Regional bank failures (March 2023) briefly rattled markets, then a rally led by artificial-intelligence names lifted US large caps to records. The Fed cut rates from September 2024, and again in late 2025 (to 3.50-3.75 percent). In April 2025 new US tariffs caused a short sharp equity decline followed by a rebound. Gold climbed to successive records through January 2026. After the US-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February 2026, oil jumped and the S&P 500 fell nearly 10 percent from its January record by late March, then recovered by mid-April and reached new records, including a first close above 7,800 in early October. Inflation re-accelerated (US CPI 3.7 percent year on year in September 2026), and the Fed, after holding at 3.50-3.75 percent from December 2025, raised the target range by 25 bp to 3.75-4.00 percent on 16 September 2026, its first hike since 2023. Facts for 2026 come from a few sources and are marked as such in the uncertain list.
Key events
- 2023-03-10: Silicon Valley Bank fails; Signature Bank closes 3/12; UBS agrees to buy Credit Suisse 3/19
- 2023-07-26: Fed's last hike in the cycle, to 5.25-5.50 percent
- 2024-09-18: Fed cuts by 50 bp, first cut of the cycle
- 2025-04-02: US announces broad 'Liberation Day' tariffs; S&P 500 low on 2025-04-08
- 2025-09-17: Fed resumes cutting
- 2025-10-29 and 2025-12-10: Fed cuts again, to 3.50-3.75 percent; the range then stays unchanged until September 2026
- 2026-01-28: gold sets a record of about $5,589 an ounce (spot)
- 2026-02-28 to 2026-03-30: US-Israeli strikes on Iran; Brent peaks near $119; S&P 500 falls nearly 10 percent from its January record
- 2026-04-15: S&P 500 closes at 7,023, back above its January record
- 2026-05-22: Kevin Warsh sworn in as Fed chair, succeeding Jerome Powell
- 2026-09-16: Fed raises the target range by 25 bp to 3.75-4.00 percent (12-0 vote), first hike since July 2023
- 2026-10-14: US CPI for September released: 3.7 percent year on year
Market facts
- S&P 500 fell about 19 percent from 19 Feb 2025 to 8 Apr 2025 (closing basis). en.wikipedia.org
- Silicon Valley Bank failed on 10 March 2023. en.wikipedia.org
- The Fed's last increase in the cycle was in July 2023 to a 5.25-5.50 percent range. www.federalreserve.gov
- The Fed cut the target range on 17 Sept, 30 Oct and 11 Dec 2025 (effective dates) to 3.50-3.75 percent, then raised it by 25 bp to 3.75-4.00 percent effective 17 Sept 2026. www.federalreserve.gov
- The FOMC voted 12-0 on 16 Sept 2026 to raise the target range to 3.75-4.00 percent and described inflation as still high. www.federalreserve.gov
- US CPI rose 3.7 percent over the 12 months to September 2026 (3.4 percent in August); gasoline was up 34.2 percent year on year. www.bls.gov
- The S&P 500 fell nearly 10 percent from its January 2026 record by late March during the Iran war, regained it by mid-April (close 7,022.95 on 15 April); Brent peaked near $119 and was about $95 on 15 April versus about $70 before the war. www.pbs.org
- The S&P 500 posted its first close above 7,800 in early October 2026, a record. www.cnbc.com
- Gold's record is about $5,589 per ounce (28 Jan 2026). www.cbsnews.com
What worked
- US large companies (S&P 500). Led by large technology names; new highs in 2024 and 2025.
- US large growth stocks. Led.
- Gold. Rose to successive record prices from 2024 through January 2026 (about $5,589); it has since given back part of the gain.
- Short-term government bonds. High yields gave positive real returns after 2022.
- Cash (Treasury bills). Higher yields, a positive real return.
What failed
- Long-term government bonds (20+ y). Volatile; 10-year Treasury yield approached 5 percent in October 2023 before easing.
- US small companies. Lagged large caps for much of the period.
- Real estate (REITs). Lagged as rates stayed high (qualitative); the Sept 2026 rate hike added pressure.
All models in this era (0)
| Model | Total | Per year | Worst drop |
|---|
Calculated on historical data. Past results do not predict the future. Models before the 1990s use stand-ins for classes that had no index yet; fees, taxes and fund costs are not included. This is mathematics, not an investment recommendation.