← All portfolios

Permanent Portfolio

Permanent Portfolio

Harry Browne (with Terry Coxon and colleagues) · 1981 (concept, Inflation-Proofing Your Investments); 25/25/25/25 form in Browne's later books (1987, 1999)

Live account on this site. This portfolio is also tracked here with a virtual $100,000 since 21.10.2026. Live account on this site →

Where it stands today

Data through 2026-09. Updated every month.

Since January+0.9 %
Last 12 months+5.3 %
Last 5 years, per year+7.3 %
Now below the peak−5.5 %
Place by 12 months54 / 60

Our calculation, 1968-04 – 2026-09

Per year8.4 %
Real (after inflation)4.3 %
Volatility7.2 %
Worst drop−15.8 %
Worst year−12.3 % (2022)
Best year37.7 %
Worst 12 months−14.6 %
Positive years84 %

Growth of $10,000

$7,888$27,845$98,297$347,000$1,224,954$4,324,245197019801990200020102020
Permanent Portfolio: $1,142,301S&P 500: $4,309,296

Where it came from

Harry Browne (1933-2006) was an American writer, investment adviser and libertarian activist, later the Libertarian Party presidential nominee in 1996 and 2000. He came to investing advice through the high-inflation 1970s, when the usual stock-and-bond mix lost purchasing power for years. Portfolio Mutiny notes that real S&P 500 value fell about 64% from the 1968 peak to 1982 and needed some 24 years to recover in real terms. The Permanent Portfolio grew out of the question of how to stay safe when nobody can predict which economic conditions come next.

Secondary accounts say Browne worked out the early versions with a small team that included Terry Coxon, John Chandler and Charles Smith. Their earlier approach had been to bet on a direction, for example towards gold. The new idea was the opposite: spread money across stocks, bonds, natural resources and cash and avoid market timing altogether. This was set out in the 1981 book Inflation-Proofing Your Investments, written by Browne and Coxon. One account says the title is misleading, since the book argues for a strategy that suits a period when inflation is brought under control as well as one when it is not.

Browne then simplified the design. The 1987 book Why the Best-Laid Investment Plans Usually Go Wrong is described as the point where the plan was reduced to equal 25% shares in U.S. stocks, Treasury bills, long-term Treasury bonds and gold. The fullest public statement is Fail-Safe Investing: Lifelong Financial Security in 30 Minutes (September 1999). It presents the four-part portfolio as protection in four economic conditions: prosperity (stocks, long bonds), inflation (gold), tight money / recession (cash, T-bills) and deflation (long Treasuries).

In 1982 the Permanent Portfolio mutual fund (ticker PRPFX) was established in San Francisco, with Browne described as a co-founder and later consultant. Wikipedia names Terry Coxon and John Chandler as founders. The fund is not a literal 25/25/25/25 copy: its stated six target categories are 35% US dollar bonds, 10% Swiss franc assets, 20% gold, 5% silver, 15% growth stocks and 15% natural-resource stocks. The Family of Funds added a Short-Term Treasury fund in 1987, Aggressive Growth in 1990 and Versatile Bond in 1991. Michael Cuggino took over the main fund in 2003. Assets rose from under $50 million to about $17 billion in 2012 after the strong 2008 result.

Interest in the DIY version revived after 2008. Craig Rowland and J. M. Lawson wrote the book The Permanent Portfolio: Harry Browne's Long-Term Investment Strategy, and the Bogleheads wiki and Portfolio Charts present the 25% x 4 version as the standard form. Browne died of ALS on 1 March 2006.

What is in it

US stocks (S&P 500 / total market index fund)25%prosperity
Long-term US Treasury bonds25%deflation (and prosperity)
Gold (bullion coins or bullion-backed ETF)25%inflation
Cash / US Treasury bills (or money market)25%tight money / recession

Source of the shares: Wikipedia, Fail-Safe Investing; Bogleheads wiki, Lazy portfolios; Portfolio Charts, Permanent Portfolio — en.wikipedia.org. All three describe equal 25% shares of stocks, long Treasuries, cash/T-bills and gold, rebalanced about once a year. The Bogleheads wiki and Portfolio Charts agree on the same four sleeves.

How we model it

US large companies (S&P 500)25%
Long-term government bonds (20+ y)25%
Gold25%
Cash (Treasury bills)25%

Stocks = S&P 500 total return; long bonds = 20+ year Treasuries; cash = T-bills; gold = gold. No substitutions needed.

For a euro investor

The same portfolio bought with euros, without currency hedging: monthly returns converted at the end-of-month rate (German mark before 1999), inflation of the euro area. History in euros from 1968-04 to 2026-09.

Per year in euros6.9 %
After euro inflation4.0 %
Worst drop in euros−29.4 %
Worst year in euros−13.1 % (1969)
Safe withdrawal, 30 years, dollars5.09 % (1968-07)
Safe withdrawal, 30 years, euros3.82 % (1968-12)

The largest first-year withdrawal, then growing with inflation, that lasted 30 years from every monthly start. Test withdrawals for this portfolio →

How to build it with European funds

Examples of UCITS funds sold in the EU for each part of the portfolio. They track similar markets, not exactly the indices of our calculation.

PartShareExample funds (ISIN)
US large companies (S&P 500)25%iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) IE00B5BMR087
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing IE00B3XXRP09
Long-term government bonds (20+ y)25%iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) IE00BSKRJZ44
Gold25%Invesco Physical Gold ETC IE00B579F325
Xetra-Gold DE000A0S9GB0
Cash (Treasury bills)25%Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C LU0290358497
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) IE00BGSF1X88

These are examples, not recommendations. Check the fund's key information document, costs and taxes with your broker before buying. Names and ISINs checked on justETF on 4 November 2026; Udak receives nothing from these funds.

The idea

Nobody can forecast the economy, so hold one asset suited to each of four conditions and let each carry the portfolio when its condition arrives. Portfolio Charts describes it as risk-parity thinking applied to economic conditions rather than to volatility.

How people buy it

Total-market or S&P 500 index fund (e.g. VTI), long Treasury fund or ETF (e.g. VGLT, TLT), physical gold or a gold ETF (GLD, IAU), T-bills or money market. The Permanent Portfolio Fund (PRPFX) is a managed fund with a different, more complex target mix.

Rebalancing as published

Fail-Safe Investing (via Wikipedia) says rebalance once a year back to 25%. Some secondary sources describe a band rule (act when a sleeve is above 35% or below 15%), but I could not confirm the wording in Browne's text.

Variants

Criticism

Through the eras

EraDatesTotalPer yearWorst dropS&P 500
The Great Inflation (stagflation)1969-01 – 1982-07+251.1 %+9.7 %−11.7 %+84.6 %
1973-74 oil shock and bear market1973-01 – 1974-12+27.1 %+12.7 %−9.8 %−41.7 %
Second oil shock and the Volcker disinflation1979-01 – 1982-08+59.3 %+13.5 %−11.7 %+59.2 %
Great bull market in stocks and bonds1982-08 – 1999-12+393.3 %+9.6 %−7.7 %+2060.4 %
Black Monday1987-08 – 1987-12−2.8 %—−7.7 %−21.8 %
Savings-and-loan crisis and 1990 recession1990-07 – 1991-03+6.3 %—−2.7 %+7.4 %
1994 bond market massacre1994-02 – 1994-12−3.0 %—−4.6 %−3.2 %
Asian and Russian financial crises1997-07 – 1998-10+11.8 %+8.8 %−4.0 %+22.4 %
Dot-com bubble and crash2000-03 – 2002-10+1.5 %+0.6 %−6.0 %−37.2 %
Recovery and housing boom2002-11 – 2007-09+64.9 %+10.7 %−4.5 %+97.0 %
Global financial crisis2007-10 – 2009-03+1.1 %+0.7 %−12.2 %−44.7 %
The decade after the crisis2009-04 – 2019-12+109.6 %+7.1 %−6.8 %+411.2 %
Fourth-quarter 2018 sell-off2018-09 – 2018-12−1.9 %—−3.0 %−14.4 %
Covid crash and stimulus boom2020-02 – 2021-12+17.4 %+8.7 %−4.6 %+53.6 %
Inflation shock and rate hikes2022-01 – 2022-12−12.3 %−12.3 %−15.8 %−19.9 %

Calendar years

-12%38%1969: -5.8%1970: +6.3%19701971: +12.2%1972: +18.8%1973: +11.8%1974: +13.7%1975: +6.7%1976: +11.6%1977: +5.2%1978: +11.0%1979: +37.7%1980: +14.5%19801981: -3.1%1982: +21.9%1983: +4.5%1984: +3.0%1985: +18.9%1986: +18.0%1987: +7.5%1988: +4.9%1989: +13.8%1990: -0.1%19901991: +13.9%1992: +3.5%1993: +11.6%1994: -1.3%1995: +19.5%1996: +5.1%1997: +7.9%1998: +11.2%1999: +4.2%2000: +2.9%20002001: -0.5%2002: +5.7%2003: +13.4%2004: +7.0%2005: +9.3%2006: +10.8%2007: +12.8%2008: +1.3%2009: +7.7%2010: +14.0%20102011: +10.4%2012: +6.4%2013: -1.6%2014: +9.0%2015: -3.1%2016: +5.6%2017: +11.2%2018: -1.8%2019: +16.1%2020: +16.9%20202021: +3.5%2022: -12.3%2023: +11.9%2024: +12.7%2025: +22.6%

Any N-year period

Any N-year periodWorst10 % worse thanMedian10 % better thanBest
1 y (691)−14.6 %−1.3 %+8.5 %+18.4 %+48.1 %
3 y (667)−1.4 %+3.5 %+8.1 %+14.6 %+22.5 %
5 y (643)+2.7 %+4.8 %+8.3 %+12.8 %+17.1 %
10 y (583)+3.4 %+6.0 %+7.9 %+12.3 %+15.1 %
15 y (523)+5.1 %+6.5 %+7.6 %+11.2 %+12.9 %
20 y (463)+6.1 %+6.7 %+7.7 %+10.6 %+11.8 %
30 y (343)+6.3 %+6.9 %+8.1 %+9.7 %+10.5 %

How it behaved in history

Published results (by others)

What we could not verify

Sources

Open in the builder

Put this card on your site →

Calculated on historical data. Past results do not predict the future. Models before the 1990s use stand-ins for classes that had no index yet; fees, taxes and fund costs are not included. This is mathematics, not an investment recommendation.