← All portfolios

Alaska Permanent Fund

Alaska Permanent Fund policy (target) asset allocation, Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, FY27 targets effective 1 July 2026

Board of Trustees of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC); investment staff led by CIO Marcus Frampton · Fund created 1976-77; targets are re-adopted by the Board each fiscal year; table used here adopted May 2026 for FY27

Live account on this site. This portfolio is also tracked here with a virtual $100,000 since 21.10.2026. Live account on this site →

Where it stands today

Data through 2026-09. Updated every month.

Since January+8.2 %
Last 12 months+10.3 %
Last 5 years, per year+5.8 %
Now below the peak−3.0 %
Place by 12 months27 / 60

Our calculation, 1926-07 – 2026-09

Per year9.4 %
Real (after inflation)6.3 %
Volatility14.1 %
Worst drop−69.5 %
Worst year−32.0 % (1931)
Best year62.2 %
Worst 12 months−49.9 %
Positive years77 %

34 % of this history is calculated with stand-ins for asset classes that did not exist yet (see “How we model it” and the page about data). Without stand-ins the history starts in 1993.

Growth of $10,000

$4,147$35,740$308,016$2,654,584$22,878,060$197,170,5081930194019501960197019801990200020102020
Alaska Permanent Fund: $85,153,633S&P 500: $196,488,890

Where it came from

The Alaska Permanent Fund is a state-owned savings fund created from oil revenue. APFC's 2026 mid-year review traces it to a first deposit of $734 thousand, which has grown to about $86.3 billion, in a year it calls the fund's 50th (source: APFC mid fiscal year review 2026). The fund is run by APFC, a public corporation whose Board of Trustees sets the asset allocation, while staff pick the investments within it (APFC board release, May 2024). The statutory goal quoted in the 2009 annual report is the maximum return while protecting principal, and the Board sets an allocation meant to earn about a 5% real return over time with prudent risk (2009 annual report).

The fund has two accounts: the principal, which is protected, and the Earnings Reserve, from which the State of Alaska draws under the Percent of Market Value (POMV) rule, at most 5% of the average fund value. In FY25 APFC transferred $3.7 billion to the State, and the FY26 draw commitment is $3.8 billion (APFC 2025 annual report press release). The Board chair says more than 60% of the state budget now depends on the fund, which is why the long-term return objective (CPI plus 5%) and liquidity matter for the allocation.

Old framework. For fiscal 2009 the target allocation was a plain stock/bond/alternatives table: US stocks 26%, US bonds 19%, global stocks 14%, non-US stocks 13%, real estate 10%, absolute return 6%, private equity 6% (read from the pie chart in the 2009 annual report; these seven add up to 94% and the remaining 6% could not be read from the extracted text). The same report says the Trustees adopted a new framework in May 2009, effective 1 July 2009 (FY2010), grouping assets by the economic conditions they address instead of by market. The investments did not change, only how they were observed.

Current framework. Today the fund describes eight asset classes: public equities, fixed income, private equity, real estate, private income, absolute return, tactical opportunities and cash. The Board adopted the FY25 targets effective 1 July 2024: public equities 32%, fixed income 20%, private equity 18% (+3), real estate 11% (-2), private income 10% (+1), absolute return 7%, tactical 1% (-1), cash 1% (-1) (APFC release, May 2024). The implied FY24 targets, from the changes printed in that release, were 32/20/15/13/9/7/2/2. The FY26 targets were kept unchanged (APFC 2025 annual report press release, which lists the same class weights).

Latest. At its meeting of 26-27 May 2026 the Board adopted the FY27 targets effective 1 July 2026: public equities 34% (+2), fixed income 20%, private equity 17% (-1), real estate 10% (-1), private income 9% (-1), absolute return 8% (+1), tactical opportunities 1%, cash 1%, total 100% (APFC Q3 board meeting press release, 28 May 2026). So the Board is moving a little from illiquid assets into liquid public equities and absolute return. This file uses these FY27 targets as the 'latest published' allocation. The policy is reviewed every fiscal year and staff may deviate within bands, so the fund's actual mix and the targets differ.

What is in it

Public equities34%FY27 target (from 1 Jul 2026); was 32% in FY24-FY26
Fixed income20%unchanged FY24-FY27
Private equity17%FY27; 18% in FY25-FY26; implied 15% in FY24
Real estate10%FY27; 11% in FY25-FY26; implied 13% in FY24
Private income9%FY27; 10% in FY25-FY26; implied 9% in FY24. APFC mentions infrastructure (power, digital) in this class
Absolute return8%FY27; 7% in FY24-FY26
Tactical opportunities1%FY27; 1% since FY25
Cash1%FY27; 1% since FY25

Source of the shares: APFC Q3 Board Meeting Press Release, 28 May 2026 (FY27 asset allocation targets) — apfc.org. States the targets adopted by the Board effective 1 July 2026 with the change from the previous year for each class, total 100%. A search summary of the Business Wire copy of the same release gave the same numbers. Earlier years: May 2024 release (FY25) and the 2025 annual report press release.

How we model it

US bond market (aggregate)20%
US large companies (S&P 500)19.4%
US small companies18%
Real estate (REITs)14%
Developed markets outside the US12%
Short-term government bonds5.6%
Emerging markets5%
Corporate bonds5%
Cash (Treasury bills)1%

Public equities 34 -> us_large 17, intl_dev 12, em 5 (50/35/15 global split is OUR assumption; APFC publishes only a total, see regional mandates in its reports). Fixed income 20 -> bond_agg 20 (APFC fixed income holds government and credit bonds; exact mix not used). Private equity 17 -> us_small 17 (listed small caps as the usual imperfect stand-in for illiquid, leveraged equity). Tactical opportunities 1 -> us_small 1 (private investments held at cost, see APFC 2025 release). Real estate 10 -> reit 10. Private income 9 (infrastructure and other income-producing private assets) -> bond_corp 5 and reit 4 (reit as the nearest listed proxy for infrastructure; split is our assumption). Absolute return 8 -> us_large 2.4 (equity beta about 0.3 assumed, as in m_stanford; APFC publishes no beta) and bond_short 5.6. Cash 1 -> cash 1. Totals: us_large 19.4, intl_dev 12, em 5, us_small 18, reit 14, bond_agg 20, bond_corp 5, bond_short 5.6, cash 1 = 100. Weights are static FY27 targets; applying them to earlier decades is a what-if, not APFC's real history (which was 1980s-2000s mostly stocks/bonds/real estate). Proxy results are not comparable with the fund's own returns.

For a euro investor

The same portfolio bought with euros, without currency hedging: monthly returns converted at the end-of-month rate (German mark before 1999), inflation of the euro area. History in euros from 1953-10 to 2026-09.

Per year in euros8.8 %
After euro inflation6.0 %
Worst drop in euros−50.8 %
Worst year in euros−27.6 % (1973)
Safe withdrawal, 30 years, dollars4.07 % (1968-12)
Safe withdrawal, 30 years, euros2.99 % (1968-12)

The largest first-year withdrawal, then growing with inflation, that lasted 30 years from every monthly start. Test withdrawals for this portfolio →

How to build it with European funds

Examples of UCITS funds sold in the EU for each part of the portfolio. They track similar markets, not exactly the indices of our calculation.

PartShareExample funds (ISIN)
US bond market (aggregate) (closest match)20%iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) IE00BDBRDM35
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) IE00B3F81409
US large companies (S&P 500)19.4%iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) IE00B5BMR087
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing IE00B3XXRP09
US small companies18%SPDR Russell 2000 U.S. Small Cap UCITS ETF IE00BJ38QD84
iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD (Acc) IE00B3VWM098
Real estate (REITs)14%iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF IE00B1FZSF77
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF IE00B1FZS350
Developed markets outside the US (closest match)12%iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) IE00B4K48X80
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF IE00B4L5YX21
Short-term government bonds5.6%iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) IE00B14X4S71
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) IE00B14X4Q57
Emerging markets5%iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) IE00BKM4GZ66
Corporate bonds5%iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) IE0032895942
Cash (Treasury bills)1%Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C LU0290358497
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) IE00BGSF1X88

These are examples, not recommendations. Check the fund's key information document, costs and taxes with your broker before buying. Names and ISINs checked on justETF on 4 November 2026; Udak receives nothing from these funds.

The idea

A sovereign endowment-style fund that must pay a 5% yearly draw to the State, keep up with inflation (CPI plus 5% objective) and avoid permanent loss. APFC describes each class by role: public equities as the largest return driver, fixed income for income and liquidity, private equity for higher long-term return, real estate for income and inflation protection, private income for steady income, absolute return for uncorrelated returns, tactical for flexible opportunities, cash for liquidity (APFC mid-year review 2026).

How people buy it

Not replicable by individuals: APFC invests through external managers, direct real estate, private partnerships, co-investments and an internal team (including internally managed fixed income announced for savings, per APFC FY22 review). Public proxies: global equity index funds, small-cap fund, REIT and infrastructure funds, aggregate bond and short bond funds.

Rebalancing as published

The Board reviews the Investment Policy Statement and the asset allocation every fiscal year; staff may deviate within bands around each target (APFC May 2024 release). Rebalancing frequency inside bands is not stated in the documents I read.

Variants

Criticism

Through the eras

EraDatesTotalPer yearWorst dropS&P 500
Roaring Twenties boom1926-07 – 1929-08+87.4 %+21.9 %−4.8 %+153.7 %
Wall Street crash and Great Contraction1929-09 – 1932-07−61.5 %−27.9 %−69.5 %−78.2 %
New Deal recovery1932-08 – 1937-02+224.9 %+29.3 %−27.9 %+268.7 %
Recession within the Depression1937-03 – 1938-03−40.5 %−38.1 %−41.0 %−49.5 %
Rearmament and World War II1938-04 – 1945-09+184.2 %+14.9 %−18.2 %+205.8 %
Postwar expansion1945-10 – 1965-12+717.6 %+10.9 %−19.7 %+1212.9 %
Golden age of the 1950s1950-01 – 1959-12+274.5 %+14.1 %−10.9 %+438.8 %
Go-go years and nifty-fifty1966-01 – 1968-12+43.6 %+12.8 %−11.9 %+34.0 %
The Great Inflation (stagflation)1969-01 – 1982-07+138.8 %+6.6 %−31.1 %+84.6 %
1973-74 oil shock and bear market1973-01 – 1974-12−28.3 %−15.3 %−31.0 %−41.7 %
Second oil shock and the Volcker disinflation1979-01 – 1982-08+60.9 %+13.8 %−11.3 %+59.2 %
Great bull market in stocks and bonds1982-08 – 1999-12+972.3 %+14.6 %−20.3 %+2060.4 %
Black Monday1987-08 – 1987-12−15.0 %—−20.3 %−21.8 %
Savings-and-loan crisis and 1990 recession1990-07 – 1991-03+5.6 %—−12.4 %+7.4 %
1994 bond market massacre1994-02 – 1994-12−3.1 %—−4.5 %−3.2 %
Asian and Russian financial crises1997-07 – 1998-10+5.0 %+3.8 %−13.5 %+22.4 %
Dot-com bubble and crash2000-03 – 2002-10−7.4 %−2.9 %−12.3 %−37.2 %
Recovery and housing boom2002-11 – 2007-09+108.9 %+16.2 %−4.8 %+97.0 %
Global financial crisis2007-10 – 2009-03−34.5 %−24.6 %−39.4 %−44.7 %
The decade after the crisis2009-04 – 2019-12+231.1 %+11.8 %−13.5 %+411.2 %
Fourth-quarter 2018 sell-off2018-09 – 2018-12−10.1 %—−10.1 %−14.4 %
Covid crash and stimulus boom2020-02 – 2021-12+30.8 %+15.1 %−15.9 %+53.6 %
Inflation shock and rate hikes2022-01 – 2022-12−16.8 %−16.8 %−21.3 %−19.9 %

Calendar years

-32%62%1927: +23.3%1928: +26.8%1929: -11.0%1930: -22.5%19301931: -32.0%1932: -2.6%1933: +62.2%1934: +4.1%1935: +34.7%1936: +28.6%1937: -26.5%1938: +21.9%1939: +0.8%1940: -3.4%19401941: -6.8%1942: +16.1%1943: +28.3%1944: +22.2%1945: +34.0%1946: -4.6%1947: +2.4%1948: +1.1%1949: +14.6%1950: +25.9%19501951: +12.6%1952: +9.7%1953: +0.2%1954: +40.0%1955: +16.7%1956: +4.3%1957: -7.7%1958: +38.5%1959: +10.3%1960: +1.7%19601961: +19.7%1962: -5.1%1963: +15.9%1964: +12.6%1965: +15.3%1966: -4.2%1967: +28.3%1968: +16.9%1969: -11.8%1970: +5.4%19701971: +14.8%1972: +8.9%1973: -14.3%1974: -16.3%1975: +29.2%1976: +29.6%1977: +5.9%1978: +8.2%1979: +22.1%1980: +22.1%19801981: +2.9%1982: +27.5%1983: +20.1%1984: +8.6%1985: +28.6%1986: +16.3%1987: -0.8%1988: +15.0%1989: +20.3%1990: -5.9%19901991: +27.9%1992: +8.2%1993: +19.4%1994: -0.0%1995: +21.0%1996: +14.6%1997: +15.5%1998: +5.3%1999: +16.4%2000: +2.1%20002001: +2.1%2002: -5.9%2003: +30.8%2004: +15.3%2005: +8.4%2006: +17.0%2007: +3.9%2008: -24.4%2009: +24.7%2010: +16.8%20102011: -0.2%2012: +13.5%2013: +17.2%2014: +8.1%2015: -1.1%2016: +9.6%2017: +14.5%2018: -5.8%2019: +20.4%2020: +12.5%20202021: +15.6%2022: -16.8%2023: +14.4%2024: +8.9%2025: +13.1%

Any N-year period

Any N-year periodWorst10 % worse thanMedian10 % better thanBest
1 y (1192)−49.9 %−7.3 %+11.4 %+27.9 %+139.1 %
3 y (1168)−30.7 %−0.3 %+10.4 %+18.1 %+40.0 %
5 y (1144)−13.3 %+3.0 %+9.8 %+16.2 %+30.9 %
10 y (1084)−0.6 %+5.9 %+9.9 %+14.3 %+17.6 %
15 y (1024)+2.8 %+7.0 %+9.8 %+13.7 %+16.9 %
20 y (964)+4.5 %+7.4 %+10.2 %+13.1 %+15.0 %
30 y (844)+7.7 %+8.5 %+10.5 %+11.8 %+13.6 %

How it behaved in history

Published results (by others)

What we could not verify

Sources

Open in the builder

Put this card on your site →

Calculated on historical data. Past results do not predict the future. Models before the 1990s use stand-ins for classes that had no index yet; fees, taxes and fund costs are not included. This is mathematics, not an investment recommendation.